Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence

Podcast Episode 18: Pro Bono Expert Evidence

Today is the start of the 24th UK Pro Bono Week. In this extra edition of the Expert Matters Podcast we discuss the EWI's recent Partnership with...
Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488... Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488...

Sidney Conway v Yeovil District Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2025] EWHC 2488...

The Claimant’s father and litigation friend alleged that the medical practitioners treating his son were negligent in not promptly carrying out...
Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026 Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026

From 1 January 2026, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee will be piloting access to public domain documents in the Commercial Court and London Circuit...
An unsatisfactory forensic medical report An unsatisfactory forensic medical report

An unsatisfactory forensic medical report

The appellant is a citizen of Iraq. He appealed against the decision of a First-tier Tribunal Judge who dismissed his appeal against the...
Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,... Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,...

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,...

The Annual Sir Michael Davies Lecture for 2025 was held on 15 October at the RAF Club in London. The Right Honourable Lady Simler, Justice of the...
Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC) Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

The Claimants alleged that dust, noise and odour emitted by the defendant’s factory over a prolonged period constituted a legal nuisance. The...
A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

Julie Andrews is a consultant Speech and Language Therapist providing assessments for Special Educational Need (SEND) tribunals and writing...
Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors
Kim Highley 1958

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

byKim Highley

 

Summary

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their expert from different angles which caused difficulties at trial.  This explained why the valuations were worlds apart (or as the judge commented they had a “manifestly excessive difference”) and needed some careful scrutiny and assessment by the judge. 

Whilst the approach of examining both valuations is very case specific, there are some fundamental tests which can be taken away.  An objective test was used several times as a benchmark looking at the scope of works that a ‘reasonable owner’ or ‘purchaser’ would require.  The key legal issue of “proportionality” was also visited frequently throughout the assessment of valuations. 

Learning points
Learning points for experts:
  • Keep in mind that reports and oral evidence should be factual.

  • Under cross-examination stay on track with your responses and don’t go beyond your field of expertise.

  • Stay clear of answering questions in a way that bolsters your client’s case.

  • Be familiar with the detail of the issues in your evidence.

  • There will be instances when you will be challenged on your evidence and need to make sensible concessions.  Particularly if you have made an error or where there is scope for a range of views.

  • Avoid arguments with counsel and ensure to answer their questions. 

  • It can go against your credibility if you don’t attempt to answer questions.

  • Approach cross-examination in a sensible and helpful manner thereby you will be more persuasive and reliable.

Learning points for instructing parties:
  • Ensure the expert grasps the matters in issue – fundamental for cross-examination.

  • Avoid a scenario which happened in this case where the judge felt that certain aspects of the expert’s evidence was work done by the instructing party’s team.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.