29 May 2026 Sean Mosby 40 Case Updates Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court bySean Mosby Summary The case concerned around 40 studio recordings of performances which were given by the members of the Jimi Hendrix Experience. The expert witnesses in New York law were commended by the judge on their written and oral evidence. The judge was not persuaded by any of the criticisms of the claimants' expert made by the defendant. Learning points Learning points for experts Your expertise is your best defence against criticism by the opposing party. As the judge in this case noted, exercising your expertise effectively includes: producing detailed reports, which read well and are clearly the product of hard work and thorough research, displaying expertise in both your written and oral evidence, and being clearly aware of your duties to the court and seeking to assist the judge to the best of your ability. Learning points for instructing parties When criticising the opposing expert, it may be wisest to base those criticisms on an objective reading of the quality of the expert’s evidence. Ensure that the material you rely on in making your criticisms supports the criticisms you are making. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and Complaints06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and Common Pitfalls David Abbott & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2026] EWHC 941 (KB) Switch article Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible Previous Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.