A deficient capacity assessment A deficient capacity assessment

A deficient capacity assessment

The task for the expert in this case was enormous. Capacity is issue specific. This means that if the issue is someone’s capacity to conduct...
The Isolation of Experts The Isolation of Experts

The Isolation of Experts

In this article, Dr Kay Linnell OBE talks about the role of the expert witness, and the problems that can be encountered when Instructing Parties go...
Competition Appeal Tribunal Practice Direction on Expert Evidence Competition Appeal Tribunal Practice Direction on Expert Evidence

Competition Appeal Tribunal Practice Direction on Expert Evidence

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has published a Practice Direction on expert evidence. The Practice Direction sets out the principles applicable to...
Fairmont Property Developers UK Ltd v Venus Bridging Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1513 Fairmont Property Developers UK Ltd v Venus Bridging Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1513

Fairmont Property Developers UK Ltd v Venus Bridging Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1513

The Claimant defaulted on a loan secured by a mortgage on a warehouse building. It disagreed with the Receiver's approach to marketing the...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

MTT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR PA117592017
Priya Vaidya 1797

MTT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR PA117592017

byPriya Vaidya

The case: The appellant, a citizen of Vietnam, born on 13 January 1972, entered the UK clandestinely on 13 September 2009 and claimed asylum on 2 July 2012. She claimed to be at risk from the 'black society' as her husband borrowed a large sum of money from them to feed his drug habit and she took over the debt since he was a drug addict and was incapable of paying back the loan. In 2003 three men visited her home, demanding repayment, threatening her with knives and threatening to kidnap her children, but she promised to repay the money the following year. In 2004 she paid back a portion of the money borrowed and she fled to another town in 2005 where she worked in a restaurant. She was found by the men and tied up, but she managed to escape. She then paid the men some more money but decided to flee Vietnam before the next payment was due. She travelled to Russia and then came to the UK on a false passport. She claimed to have been transported from Vietnam to Russia and then through Europe to the UK, and to have been sexually exploited and forced to work as a prostitute. The Competent Authority concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the appellant had been a victim of trafficking.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.