EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

“If an Expert, a lawyer, an accountant, an engineer, a doctor produce inaccurate or unreliable opinions or use hallucinatory references, they are...
Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

The Claimant suffered serious injuries in a road traffic accident after the Defendant, who was driving out of a side road, collided with the...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...
New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

The EWI has just published its new guide to Becoming and Expert Witness. Written by EWI Member Paul Beckett, the guide is aimed at those who are...
Ill-health and sentencing Ill-health and sentencing

Ill-health and sentencing

After summarising the case law, the court in this case stated that there is a high threshold to be reached in order for ill health or physical...
Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

The parties disagreed on the extent of the repairs required to the joists, and the manner in which the repairs should be effected, following the...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Have your say in this important research and be in with a chance of winning £200 in vouchers of your choice.

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

MTT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR PA117592017
Priya Vaidya 2364

MTT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR PA117592017

by Priya Vaidya

The case: The appellant, a citizen of Vietnam, born on 13 January 1972, entered the UK clandestinely on 13 September 2009 and claimed asylum on 2 July 2012. She claimed to be at risk from the 'black society' as her husband borrowed a large sum of money from them to feed his drug habit and she took over the debt since he was a drug addict and was incapable of paying back the loan. In 2003 three men visited her home, demanding repayment, threatening her with knives and threatening to kidnap her children, but she promised to repay the money the following year. In 2004 she paid back a portion of the money borrowed and she fled to another town in 2005 where she worked in a restaurant. She was found by the men and tied up, but she managed to escape. She then paid the men some more money but decided to flee Vietnam before the next payment was due. She travelled to Russia and then came to the UK on a false passport. She claimed to have been transported from Vietnam to Russia and then through Europe to the UK, and to have been sexually exploited and forced to work as a prostitute. The Competent Authority concluded that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the appellant had been a victim of trafficking.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.