Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Following last month’s case update by Professor Keith Rix of Brown v Morgan Sindall, several experts have offered further reflections on the use...
Read between the lines, judge Read between the lines, judge

Read between the lines, judge

Familiar to all experts, this case illustrates how personal injury claimants can attempt to maximise their claim by dishonestly reporting symptoms and...
John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70 John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70

John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70

The person insured by the defendant drove his motorcycle into the pursuer’s parked lorry causing the pursuer, who claimed he was standing on the...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR HU205022019
Priya Vaidya 1654

Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR HU205022019

byPriya Vaidya

The case: The appellant is a national of Pakistan. She arrived in the United Kingdom on 11 February 2019 with leave to enter as a visitor. On 23 July 2019, she applied for leave to remain. Her application was refused.  Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted. This was an appeal against the respondent's decision to refuse her application for leave to remain. The appellant’s case was that she came to the UK, accompanied by her son. However, the death of her husband had a deep impact on her and once in the UK, her health deteriorated. The appellant claimed she was now frail, tearful, forgetful and lonely, and had mental health issues such that she now required 24-hour care and supervision. She claimed she required help with dressing, bathing, cooking, walking, social interaction and administering medication. She claims that if returned to Pakistan, she would have insufficient support and would not be able to care for herself.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.