An expert report that is almost worse than useless An expert report that is almost worse than useless

An expert report that is almost worse than useless

The claimant was involved in a minor road traffic accident while she was the passenger in a car driven by her partner, who was the defendant’s...
When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

Most professionals who act as expert witnesses are potentially subject to fitness to practice or other types of regulatory or professional body...
The admin behind the expertise The admin behind the expertise

The admin behind the expertise

Highlights from the EWI Technology and Practice Survey 2026 A survey by the Expert Witness Institute, supported by Fortythree Tech
If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

The expert acting for the appellant had appeared before the Valuation Tribunal for England as advocate and expert for the appellant, and he continued...
Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process

Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process

In this case, the Family Court makes clear the position with regard to people who describe themselves as psychologists but are not (a) regulated by a...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication
Sean Mosby 757

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication

bySean Mosby

 

The Forensic Science Regulator ('FSR') has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance sets out principles and expectations covering all types of interpretation of observations and communication of opinion in Forensic Science Activities ('FSAs'). It applies to all report types. The guidance supports the delivery of balanced, robust, transparent, and logical expert opinion within the Criminal Justice System and applies to:

a. All FSAs subject to the Regulator’s Code of Practice. 

b. All practitioners, regardless of their role and whether they consider themselves to be expert witnesses or not, who carry out FSAs and provide evidence that would be expected to be outside the court’s knowledge and experience.

This Guidance supports the part of the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice that sets out requirements for reporting results, including interpretation and opinion development (specifically section 31 in version 2 of the Code). It also supports compliance with obligations under the Criminal Procedure Rules and Criminal Practice Directions

The EWI provided a response to the FSR's consultation on the Guidance. 

The new Guidance is available here

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.