A medical report to which the court gave little weight A medical report to which the court gave little weight

A medical report to which the court gave little weight

This is yet another case in which a medical report has been given little weight in immigration and asylum proceedings. Begum v Secretary of State for...
DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026) DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026)

DLP Ltd v Coram UK Holding Ltd [2026] EWHC 2448 (IPEC) (25 September 2026)

The Claimant asserted that the Defendant had infringed their patent for an electric shower-waster pump and control unit. The trial related to...
EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships

EWI awards three Honorary Fellowships

David Cowan, Leam Craig. and Kathryn Newns have been recognised for their contribution to the Expert Witness community.  
Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence

Podcast Episode 31: 30 years of Expert Evidence

This month we have a special episode to celebrate 30 years since the Expert Witness Institute was launched on 8 November 2026. We are going to look...
Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2023] UKSC 2 Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2023] UKSC 2

Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd [2023] UKSC 2

The case concerned the non-payment by a tenant of a commercial service charge. In considering the tenant’s permitted contractual defences of “manifest...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication
Sean Mosby 2778

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication

by Sean Mosby

 

The Forensic Science Regulator ('FSR') has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance sets out principles and expectations covering all types of interpretation of observations and communication of opinion in Forensic Science Activities ('FSAs'). It applies to all report types. The guidance supports the delivery of balanced, robust, transparent, and logical expert opinion within the Criminal Justice System and applies to:

a. All FSAs subject to the Regulator’s Code of Practice. 

b. All practitioners, regardless of their role and whether they consider themselves to be expert witnesses or not, who carry out FSAs and provide evidence that would be expected to be outside the court’s knowledge and experience.

This Guidance supports the part of the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice that sets out requirements for reporting results, including interpretation and opinion development (specifically section 31 in version 2 of the Code). It also supports compliance with obligations under the Criminal Procedure Rules and Criminal Practice Directions

The EWI provided a response to the FSR's consultation on the Guidance. 

The new Guidance is available here. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.