Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch) Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch)

Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch)

The claimant sought damages amounting to the difference between the £16.9 million contract sale price from a failed house sale and the sum ultimately...
Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me -  Tony Saggers Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

In this month's in 'A case that changed me' we are talking with Tony Saggers who is a Threat, Risk and Harm consultant, with 30 years of...
Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service  Board:... Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

The decision in O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board [2025] CSOH 17 provides important guidance on the legal and professional standards...
Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

At a recent Frontier Economics Litigation event, the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, The Honourable Mrs Justice Bacon, warned that...
EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

“If an Expert, a lawyer, an accountant, an engineer, a doctor produce inaccurate or unreliable opinions or use hallucinatory references, they are...
Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

The Claimant suffered serious injuries in a road traffic accident after the Defendant, who was driving out of a side road, collided with the...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...
New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

The EWI has just published its new guide to Becoming and Expert Witness. Written by EWI Member Paul Beckett, the guide is aimed at those who are...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we preview the EWI  Annual Conference which will be held virtually on 19 June 2026. We look at some of...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Reviewing our document/data retention policy
Wiebke Morgan 3767

Reviewing our document/data retention policy

by Wiebke Morgan

Firstly, in terms of contractual and/or tortious liabilities, the law in relation to limitation is notoriously complex and anyone thinking about how to deal with retention of paperwork should certainly talk to their liability insurers for advice.  Even where the limitation period in relation to a particular contractual or tortious liability is 6 years (which is often quoted as the legally required time), there may be debate about when "time starts to run" and in practical terms the court documents in relation to such a claim do not have to be served on the defendant immediately they are issued at court, so to allow for some leeway, a minimum period of 7 years might be wise, but as mentioned above, it would be best to take specific advice from your insurers.  The situation can become very complex if for example the matter has involved a child, a protected party or a claim for provisional damages.
 
If  we are interpreting your question correctly then you are not asking about keeping documents to satisfy HMRC or to rely on in the event of litigation against your firm, Rather we think  you are asking about the need to keep records in case the matter to which they relate goes to a trial in court and your (your expert's) evidence is needed.  The law of limitation does of course not govern this time period.  
 
The ideal approach in this case would be to: "when the case settles, then your system should automatically delete all info, other the invoice and the actual report."  
 
That approach is, of course, dependent on the solicitor telling you that the case has settled.  
 
The difficulty for you might be to know when a particular case has concluded.  Some cases may well take more than 6 years from the date of instruction to conclude and it is conceivable that some of those cases could go to court and thus you would need to have access to the relevant documents.  The instructing solicitor might well be able to provide copies of many of the relevant documents but the expert/your firm would be expected to have kept any records of their own until the conclusion of the case.
 
You will also have to consider your GDPR position and be aware of not keeping personal data for longer than is necessary.
So on a practical level, you would ideally retain all records until notified that a case has concluded and then for the appropriate period thereafter as describe above in terms of contractual liabilities.  
 
Touching on the point of whether to keep paper or electronic records, we would add that if you elect to keep the records electronically you need to be mindful of security and back up.
 
In summary, as a minimum:
 
1.     From a liability perspective, you should talk to your insurers ;
2.     From an on-going duty to the client perspective, you should talk to the instructing solicitors to clarify their expectations and to agree a policy;

 

There is some helpful advice on this page including an example saying that an organisation can keep limited amounts of data available about previous clients if there is a possibility of a complaint:

 

Principle (e): Storage limitation | ICO

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.