Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant

Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant

As in many family cases, the issue here was the cause of the child’s injuries. It includes a distinction to be made between handling in...
Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate

Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate

For the specialists this case illustrates how the court investigates case of perplexing presentations in children and the importance of considering as...
Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning... Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning...

Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning...

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published guidance for professionals and litigants who represent themselves on the use of covert recordings in...
Access to public domain documents pilot Access to public domain documents pilot

Access to public domain documents pilot

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee has approved in principle a 2-year pilot on “access to public domain documents” in the Commercial...
How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims

How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims

The EWI has been provided with a copy of a recently written paper setting out the risk of re-traumatising claimants in medico-legal litigation and...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...
Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch) Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)

Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)

The claimants, who carried on a business breeding falcons, made allegations of harassment and nuisance against their neighbour, who operated a small...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Reviewing our document/data retention policy
Wiebke Morgan 1284

Reviewing our document/data retention policy

byWiebke Morgan

Firstly, in terms of contractual and/or tortious liabilities, the law in relation to limitation is notoriously complex and anyone thinking about how to deal with retention of paperwork should certainly talk to their liability insurers for advice.  Even where the limitation period in relation to a particular contractual or tortious liability is 6 years (which is often quoted as the legally required time), there may be debate about when "time starts to run" and in practical terms the court documents in relation to such a claim do not have to be served on the defendant immediately they are issued at court, so to allow for some leeway, a minimum period of 7 years might be wise, but as mentioned above, it would be best to take specific advice from your insurers.  The situation can become very complex if for example the matter has involved a child, a protected party or a claim for provisional damages.
 
If  we are interpreting your question correctly then you are not asking about keeping documents to satisfy HMRC or to rely on in the event of litigation against your firm, Rather we think  you are asking about the need to keep records in case the matter to which they relate goes to a trial in court and your (your expert's) evidence is needed.  The law of limitation does of course not govern this time period.  
 
The ideal approach in this case would be to: "when the case settles, then your system should automatically delete all info, other the invoice and the actual report."  
 
That approach is, of course, dependent on the solicitor telling you that the case has settled.  
 
The difficulty for you might be to know when a particular case has concluded.  Some cases may well take more than 6 years from the date of instruction to conclude and it is conceivable that some of those cases could go to court and thus you would need to have access to the relevant documents.  The instructing solicitor might well be able to provide copies of many of the relevant documents but the expert/your firm would be expected to have kept any records of their own until the conclusion of the case.
 
You will also have to consider your GDPR position and be aware of not keeping personal data for longer than is necessary.
So on a practical level, you would ideally retain all records until notified that a case has concluded and then for the appropriate period thereafter as describe above in terms of contractual liabilities.  
 
Touching on the point of whether to keep paper or electronic records, we would add that if you elect to keep the records electronically you need to be mindful of security and back up.
 
In summary, as a minimum:
 
1.     From a liability perspective, you should talk to your insurers ;
2.     From an on-going duty to the client perspective, you should talk to the instructing solicitors to clarify their expectations and to agree a policy;

 

There is some helpful advice on this page including an example saying that an organisation can keep limited amounts of data available about previous clients if there is a possibility of a complaint:

 

Principle (e): Storage limitation | ICO

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.