Biased instructions, harassment and acting pro bono Biased instructions, harassment and acting pro bono

Biased instructions, harassment and acting pro bono

Few reported cases assist as to expert evidence in cases of harassment and on the issue of injury to feelings as distinct from psychiatric injury....
An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

The defendants denied the validity of a will on the grounds that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity. The judge found that the conclusion of...
Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) is intending to review its ‘Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims’ with a...
Update on EWI Advocacy Update on EWI Advocacy

Update on EWI Advocacy

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Legal Aid: Experts' Fees Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

This case is of obvious importance to experts authorised by the Family Court to be instructed in public law proceedings but it has implications for...
EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an... EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest
Emma Mitra 1216

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest

byEmma Mitra

Our annual Sir Michael Davies lecture is always a highlight on the EWI calendar. This year, we welcomed The Hon Mr Justice Trower, a British High Court judge and member of The Civil Procedure Rule Committee, to deliver the speech.

Mr Justice Trower gave a fascinating look into the theme of ‘Independence, bias and conflicts of interest: when might the independence of an expert’s evidence be regarded by the court as compromised, and what are the consequences when it is?’.

Read a summary of his key insights below and purchase acccess to the lecture in full here.

Listening to the lecture can be logged as ½ CPD hours.

 

Independence and what it means for Expert Witnesses

  • Independence is an issue that every Expert will have to think about – whatever the nature or their expertise or the setting in which their evidence is given.
  • Any hint of a lack of independence can prove fertile ground for a submission that an expert’s opinion should be afforded little weight, or in an extreme case rejected altogether.
  • The concept of independence is spelt out in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 35 Practice Direction and the Guidance of the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims.
  • The CPR and the authorities have described the concept of independence as being focused on the Expert evidence, rather than whether the Expert can properly be characterised as objectively ‘independent’ as an individual. 
  • A helpful way of thinking about independence as an Expert is the absence of dependency. The creation of an independent work product involves conduct which is autonomous and not subject to the authority, control or inappropriate influence of another person or their interest or view.
  • Discussions between lawyers and experts should not led to the preparation of Expert Reports which include material drafted by lawyers or, more subtly, drafting guided by them. There are few things more damaging to the credibility and usefulness a report if it reads like a crafted piece of written advocacy.

 

Conflicts of interest and potential bias

  • Conflicts of interest don’t always render expert evidence inadmissible, but full details of the nature of that interest must always be disclosed: if in doubt about any pre-existing relationship, make full disclosure.
  • There’s a distinction between the admissibility of evidence adduced from an Expert who has a pre-existing relationship with the party by whom they are instructed, and the weight it will be accorded by the court when deciding the case.
  • An Expert in this position can expect to be challenged on the independence of their work product during the course of cross examination to test their willingness and ability to carry out their primary duty to the court.
  • In its most extreme form, conscious bias arises where an Expert willingly offers whatever opinion is required, without regard to whether it reflects their considered views.
  • Unconscious bias is a trickier problem and flows from what a respected Australian judge (Justice Peter McClellan) has called “the influence of the inevitable human desire to win the debate”. Experts who regularly give evidence for the same client are likely to be more prone to this phenomenon than those who do not. 
  • Perhaps the best form of defence against unconscious bias is that Experts with integrity should always remember that, although the desire to win is a natural human condition, they are not a competitor in the race. They are simply there to help the umpire achieve the just result.

 

Listen to the Sir Michael Davies lecture in full and earn ½ CPD hours.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.