Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC) Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

The Claimants alleged that dust, noise and odour emitted by the defendant’s factory over a prolonged period constituted a legal nuisance. The...
Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Her appointment was announced at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on Wednesday 15th October.. 
Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

The award was made at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on the 15th of October.
Impact speed and risk of injury Impact speed and risk of injury

Impact speed and risk of injury

There are some general learning points for all experts but otherwise this is for neurosurgeons. It is another road traffic accident personal injury...
A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

Julie Andrews is a consultant Speech and Language Therapist providing assessments for Special Educational Need (SEND) tribunals and writing...
Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Following last month’s case update by Professor Keith Rix of Brown v Morgan Sindall, several experts have offered further reflections on the use...
Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025 Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Resolve and EWI held our annual Scottish Medicolegal Conference at the Grand Central Hotel in Glasgow on 19 September. The event featured great...
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest
Emma Mitra 2316

Independence, bias and conflicts of interest

byEmma Mitra

Our annual Sir Michael Davies lecture is always a highlight on the EWI calendar. This year, we welcomed The Hon Mr Justice Trower, a British High Court judge and member of The Civil Procedure Rule Committee, to deliver the speech.

Mr Justice Trower gave a fascinating look into the theme of ‘Independence, bias and conflicts of interest: when might the independence of an expert’s evidence be regarded by the court as compromised, and what are the consequences when it is?’.

Read a summary of his key insights below and purchase acccess to the lecture in full here.

Listening to the lecture can be logged as ½ CPD hours.

 

Independence and what it means for Expert Witnesses

  • Independence is an issue that every Expert will have to think about – whatever the nature or their expertise or the setting in which their evidence is given.
  • Any hint of a lack of independence can prove fertile ground for a submission that an expert’s opinion should be afforded little weight, or in an extreme case rejected altogether.
  • The concept of independence is spelt out in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 35 Practice Direction and the Guidance of the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims.
  • The CPR and the authorities have described the concept of independence as being focused on the Expert evidence, rather than whether the Expert can properly be characterised as objectively ‘independent’ as an individual. 
  • A helpful way of thinking about independence as an Expert is the absence of dependency. The creation of an independent work product involves conduct which is autonomous and not subject to the authority, control or inappropriate influence of another person or their interest or view.
  • Discussions between lawyers and experts should not led to the preparation of Expert Reports which include material drafted by lawyers or, more subtly, drafting guided by them. There are few things more damaging to the credibility and usefulness a report if it reads like a crafted piece of written advocacy.

 

Conflicts of interest and potential bias

  • Conflicts of interest don’t always render expert evidence inadmissible, but full details of the nature of that interest must always be disclosed: if in doubt about any pre-existing relationship, make full disclosure.
  • There’s a distinction between the admissibility of evidence adduced from an Expert who has a pre-existing relationship with the party by whom they are instructed, and the weight it will be accorded by the court when deciding the case.
  • An Expert in this position can expect to be challenged on the independence of their work product during the course of cross examination to test their willingness and ability to carry out their primary duty to the court.
  • In its most extreme form, conscious bias arises where an Expert willingly offers whatever opinion is required, without regard to whether it reflects their considered views.
  • Unconscious bias is a trickier problem and flows from what a respected Australian judge (Justice Peter McClellan) has called “the influence of the inevitable human desire to win the debate”. Experts who regularly give evidence for the same client are likely to be more prone to this phenomenon than those who do not. 
  • Perhaps the best form of defence against unconscious bias is that Experts with integrity should always remember that, although the desire to win is a natural human condition, they are not a competitor in the race. They are simply there to help the umpire achieve the just result.

 

Listen to the Sir Michael Davies lecture in full and earn ½ CPD hours.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.