Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

The Family Procedure Rule Committee has approved a proposal to roll-out the family court reporting pilot nationally, through changes to the Family...
Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence

Judicial analysis of written expert healthcare evidence

This is an important judgment for experts who prepare personal injury reports in the Republic of Ireland but also for all experts, in all of the...
Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor... Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor...

Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor...

The Appellant was given permission to change neurology experts after the judge found that the application was not so late as to be prejudicial to the...
New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

The new Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal came into force on 1 November 2024. The Practice Direction...
Kay Linnell awarded OBE in New Year Honours List Kay Linnell awarded OBE in New Year Honours List

Kay Linnell awarded OBE in New Year Honours List

Dr Linnell received the award for services to Justice.
Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

In the last podcast for 2024, we look back at the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over the course of 2024, and highlight the...
When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness

When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness

The judge found that the evidence of the claimants' psychological expert fell well below the standard to be expected of a competent expert...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Range of Opinion is the focus of the 5th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast. We catch up with Colin Holburn, Chair of the EWI Membership Committee,...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB)
Sean Mosby 426

Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB)

bySean Mosby

 

Summary

The defendant’s spinal cord injury expert in this case agreed early on in his cross-examination that he had lost all objectivity and independence in the case, while the defendant’s physiotherapy and accommodation experts were criticised by the judge for adopting more partisan approaches in their later evidence.

Learning points

Learning points for experts:

  • Never lose sight of the fact that your overriding duty is to the court and not the party instructing you or the party paying you.

  • Make sure you have fully understood and comply with the procedural rules, practice directions and guidance that govern the case you are acting in.

  • It is wise to obtain (and regularly refresh) your understanding of these rules and regulations with training from a reputable provider to ensure that the rules are inculcated into your practice.

  • Simply reading the rules and regulations is not likely to be sufficient. See for example, The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness training (ewi.org.uk) where the expert did not understand the duties of an expert witness despite having received a written explanation of them.

  • If you change your opinion once you receive more information, make sure you explain clearly why the additional information resulted in the change.  

  • Make sure you are ready to justify, during oral evidence, any concessions you make during the discussions with the other expert and the joint statement.

  • If you realise you have made a mistake in the joint statement, correct it immediately with a supplemental letter and explain clearly why the mistake occurred.

  • Clearly state the documents that you have reviewed in drafting your reports and always be willing to acknowledge this under cross-examination.

  • It is critical to resist pressure from your instructing party to change your opinion in any way that does not reflect your honest, independent expert opinion.    

Learning points for instructing parties:

  • Instructing parties must not pressure expert witnesses to change their opinion in any way that does not reflect the expert’s honest, independent opinion.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.