What does deterioration mean? What does deterioration mean?

What does deterioration mean?

In this case the issue was the extent or degree of the deterioration, its real world impact in terms of effect on daily life and ability to cope and...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of... How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of...

The judgement from The Honourable Mr Justice Trower asserts that Expert Witnesses have a duty to disclose previous criticisms of their evidence in...
Rebecca Hepworth v Dr Amanda Coates [2025] EWHC 1907 (KB) Rebecca Hepworth v Dr Amanda Coates [2025] EWHC 1907 (KB)

Rebecca Hepworth v Dr Amanda Coates [2025] EWHC 1907 (KB)

The Claimant sought damages for clinical negligence from the Defendant who, she asserted, failed to diagnose red flag symptoms of cauda equina...
Access to Justice Inquiry Access to Justice Inquiry

Access to Justice Inquiry

The House of Commons, Justice Committee has published a Call for Evidence for its Inquiry on Access to Justice. The Inquiry will examine how advice...
Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth

Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth

Although this is a case of alleged dental negligence and can be usefully read in full not only by dental experts, but by dentists, oral surgeons and...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee has published a new consolidation of the Criminal Procedure Rules and an accompanying guide. The new Rules will...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

A mother's malign influence on her children
Keith Rix 976

A mother's malign influence on her children

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is a case which will assume much greater importance for the 15 points of practice and practical steps that the judge decided can help reduce the risk of well-meaning professionals falling into pitfalls that hinder the identification of safeguarding issues at an early stage than as a case with learning points for experts.

For some of the experts in the fields from which jointly appointed experts were instructed, it illustrates how their evidence is tested and applied in a case of suspected fabricated or induced illness (FII).

The evidence of two of the experts illustrates the importance of healthcare experts having regard to the reliability of the evidence on which they rely. The toxicology expert raised some concerns about the accreditation of the hospital laboratory where tests had been carried out. He was clear that the process adopted was entirely appropriate for clinical purposes and the purposes of the court but described “the analysis as not being 'good' but 'not bad'” leading the court to acknowledge that the testing was not forensically robust. Likewise, the respiratory expert was quick to recognise the limitations in commenting on still bronchoscopy images as supplemented by a thorax CT scan. It is for the court to decide on the reliability of evidence but in doing so the court requires the assistance of experts who can identify matters relevant to reliability that would otherwise be beyond the knowledge and understanding of the court.

It appears that the cross-examination of some experts lasted for days. For those whose reports addressed the reliability of the evidence on which they relied their cross-examination might have lasted longer and their evidence carried left weight had they not addressed the reliability of the evidence.

There were a number of experts in this case but they did not include an expert in paediatric gastro-enterology. When an issue arose as to the connection between cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency, the court accepted the evidence of the paediatric respiratory medicine expert, even though he made it clear that he is not an expert in paediatric gastro-enterology. This can be regarded as an example of the court relying on an expert’s working knowledge of a matter on the border or outside their field of expertise.  

Learning point
  • An expert’s report should include a consideration of the reliability of the evidence on which they rely.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.