Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

The Family Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A on court bundles.
The Single Biggest Change White Paper The Single Biggest Change White Paper

The Single Biggest Change White Paper

Earlier this year, we asked our members about the single biggest change they’ve seen since they started practicing as an Expert Witness. With...
Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic...
Episode 4: Expert Fees Episode 4: Expert Fees

Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and... Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has updated its Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and Non-Compliance with the Forensic Science Regulator: Code of...
Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

The detail of this judgment will mainly be of interest to paediatricians, radiologists and clinical pharmacologists as it is another case in which...
The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

This is an important case because it corrects a misunderstanding about the test for capacity. There has been an established view that the Mental...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...
Episode 3: Single Joint Expert Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Simon and Sean discuss Single Joint Experts and catch up with two EWI members who act as Single Joint Experts to hear about their experiences, the...
A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

Tom Magner provides independent technical assistance as an Expert Witness. Specialising in the forensic investigation of mechanical, electrical, and...
Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness... Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Simon and Sean discuss the importance of Expert Witness training in the context of Gareth Jenkins' evidence at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry...
A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

Efstathios Maliakis is senior electrical engineer with 20 years’ experience, including 10 years supervising the construction of power plants. A...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Medical Experts in the Family Courts
Priya Vaidya 2814

Medical Experts in the Family Courts

byPriya Vaidya

EWI welcomes the final report and recommendations from the Family Division’s working group on Medical Experts in the Family Courts but raises continued concern about how these recommendations will be delivered.

 

Whilst EWI are pleased to see the recommendations and believe these will go a long way in strengthening the pool of experts who are willing to work in the Family Courts, we are questioning whether the recommendations risk duplication of effort and reinventing the wheel in some areas.

 

The recommendations place a large emphasis on the Royal Colleges developing guidance for Expert Witnesses and, though it is suggested that they should consider our role, they are not specifically instructed to work with the Institute (or indeed The Academy of Experts) to create the guidance. This seems a missed opportunity and there is the potential for the various Royal Colleges to create guidance where this could be coordinated and hosted by the Institute.

 

In addition, while the report acknowledges the Directories of Expert Witnesses that are in existence (including the EWI’s) they still conclude that a “Centralised Register of Accredited Court Experts were felt at present to be beyond the capacity of the WG or the FJC to currently progress although it is a subject that that we believe should be further considered by the FJC.”

 

Chief Executive, Simon Berney-Edwards, said “The report seems to ignore the point that the EWI directory isn’t just a directory, it provides instructing parties with a list of fully vetted experts whose professional credentials have been checked and the quality of their reports have been assessed as being compliant with appropriate regulations and are of excellent quality. It is therefore not inconceivable that the courts could consider recognising our Directory and, if they have additional requirements, discuss these with us to build into our quality assessment processes.”

 

We welcome the creation of a Family Justice Council Sub-Committee to oversee the implementation of these recommendations, but note that members seem to be limited to those within the working group and does not include anyone from the EWI (or any other Expert Witness body). This, once again, seems to be a missed opportunity.

 

Access the Final Report https://www.judiciary.uk/publications/the-president-of-the-family-division-working-group-on-medical-experts-in-the-family-courts-final-report/ 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.