Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

The Family Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A on court bundles.
The Single Biggest Change White Paper The Single Biggest Change White Paper

The Single Biggest Change White Paper

Earlier this year, we asked our members about the single biggest change they’ve seen since they started practicing as an Expert Witness. With...
Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic...
Episode 4: Expert Fees Episode 4: Expert Fees

Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and... Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has updated its Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and Non-Compliance with the Forensic Science Regulator: Code of...
Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

The detail of this judgment will mainly be of interest to paediatricians, radiologists and clinical pharmacologists as it is another case in which...
The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

This is an important case because it corrects a misunderstanding about the test for capacity. There has been an established view that the Mental...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...
Episode 3: Single Joint Expert Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Simon and Sean discuss Single Joint Experts and catch up with two EWI members who act as Single Joint Experts to hear about their experiences, the...
A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

Tom Magner provides independent technical assistance as an Expert Witness. Specialising in the forensic investigation of mechanical, electrical, and...
Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness... Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Simon and Sean discuss the importance of Expert Witness training in the context of Gareth Jenkins' evidence at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry...
A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

Efstathios Maliakis is senior electrical engineer with 20 years’ experience, including 10 years supervising the construction of power plants. A...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Need for law firms to instruct ‘impartial, objective and reasonable’ expert witnesses
Priya Vaidya 2696

Need for law firms to instruct ‘impartial, objective and reasonable’ expert witnesses

byPriya Vaidya

By Amanda Stevens, Managing Director, London and South  - Hudgell Solicitors

 

There have been many recent cases highlighting difficulties with expert evidence before the courts and many judicial observations on the importance of robust expert opinion to assist in the fair administration of justice.

 

The conference highlighted some key learning points for practitioners. A large number of highly-respected judges, barristers, solicitors and experts contributed to the debate.

 

As the Managing Director of a firm which instructs expert witnesses on a daily basis, it was particularly fascinating to hear from judges and leading counsel as to what they feel makes the best expert witness.

 

Clearly, it is not always simply a matter of finding the leading authority in a subject area to support your case.

 

Indeed, more often than not, an expert that comes across as truly independent and able to clearly communicate why they believe their opinion should be accepted. Those open to questioning and even accept some of the opposing views presented, are also the best to instruct.

 

Experts must remain witnesses and not become advocates

For my part, as a representative of one of the UK’s leading clinical negligence firms, I found a panel discussion on ‘Lessons from the Courts’, which reflected on both good and bad practice seen from experts by judges and barristers, particularly enlightening.

 

The panel included His Honour Judge Nigel Lickley QC, High Court Judge, The Hon Mrs Justice McGowan, and Alexander Hutton QC, one of the UK’s leading clinical negligence counsel.

 

Mr Hutton QC, raising the issue of impartiality, said: “It should be etched on any expert’s heart that evidence should be uninfluenced by the pressures of litigation, it should be objective, unbiased, within their areas of expertise and they should not assume the role of an advocate.”

 

He added: “A lot of the criticism in clinical negligence judgements of experts is that they have lost sight of those principals and have become an advocate for their party. Of course, the vast majority of experts don’t, but one can see the pressures on experts to do that are immense and shouldn’t be underestimated.

 

“There is an enormous amount of pressure to do the best for the client. It is very difficult to resist but it must be resisted by asking ‘would I say the same if I were on the other side?’

 

These words were echoed by Mrs Justice McGowan, who said all expert witnesses should remember they are instructed to assist the court and the judge.

 

“Nobody should stand in a witness box without having asked themselves ‘is this the opinion I would have given if the court had instructed me or if the other side had instructed me?’ she said.

 

“The best experts listen to the question, think about the question and then answer it. That’s whether it comes from their side, the other side, or the court.

 

“The worst expert witnesses are those that show off. They may be the world leading authority in a particular field, but that doesn’t mean that they are right on this occasion.

 

“As a judge I want to be assisted by the expert witnesses. I want to know whether the issue I have to determine is as straight forward as one side tells me it is, or whether the challenges and concerns the other side are raising are genuine. I am looking for help. I need someone to guide me in an area I don’t know about. I don’t need someone to tell me what the law is.”

 

His Honour Judge Nigel Lickley QC said he believes the key for all expert witnesses is to ‘remember the target audience’.

 

“My major point is that experts must remember who the target audience is and focus on them. If you appear in front of a jury as a witness the people who decide the facts are the 12 jurors. It’s therefore absolutely vital to be able to convey the science and expertise to these 12 people from different backgrounds,” he said.

 

“You are not there to win the argument but to express your view. The best is an expert who is reasonable, the person prepared to consider, dismiss or even accept the opposing view is by far the most impressive witness.”

 

I would urge both experienced and new expert witnesses, and those who instruct them, to take the time to listen to the conference recordings on the Expert Witness Institute’s website, and benefit from the excellent expertise on offer.

The 2020 Conference recordings can be access at www.ewi.org.uk/ac2020

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.