Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from  two Expert Quantity Surveyors Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors

The complexities of this case required both parties to engage expert quantity surveyors.  Both sides approached their instructions to their...
Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings

Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings

The parties sought permission to rely on expert evidence from three experts in respect of the claimant’s tazkira, an official identity document...
Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost... Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost...

Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost...

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee (‘Committee) decided, provisionally, to postpone the extended Fixed Recoverable Cost (‘FRC’)...
Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police  [2025] EWHC 272 (KB) Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2025] EWHC 272 (KB)

Mark Dobson v The Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police [2025] EWHC 272 (KB)

The judge determined that the evidence of the defendant’s expert on the mental health of a man detained by the police was to be preferred in...
Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in... Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

Family Procedure Rules Consultation concerning the instruction of unregulated experts in...

In recent years a range of stakeholders have raised concerns regarding unregulated experts providing evidence in family law court cases and the...
EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

EWI guidance for experts approached by unscrupulous expert witness agencies

While there are many respectable and legitimate expert witness agencies who provide brilliant support to the expert witnesses who work with them,...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...
Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness

In the 9th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at how to become an Expert Witnesss. If you think expert witness work might be for you,...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A
Sean Mosby 588

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

bySean Mosby

The Family Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A. Practice Direction 27A sets out universal practice in respect of court bundles in family proceedings in the High Court and the Family Court. 

The Committee’s aim is for a new PD27A to reflect the fact that electronic bundles are commonly used now in most family proceedings and also to bring into PD27A provisions which are currently made in judicial guidance. This guidance includes the General Guidance on electronic court bundles (29 November 2021), the Guidance on e-bundles for use in the family court and Family Division (21 December 2021) and the Statement on the Efficient Conduct of Financial Remedy Proceedings in the Financial Remedies Court (11 January 2022).

A key purpose is to ensure clarity on the process and consistency across how bundles are formulated. The Committee intends for the new PD27A to be a comprehensive source of requirements for the preparation of bundles in family proceedings, with which anyone preparing a bundle is able to comply, providing in-depth guidance on the preparation of bundles, including in relation to the content, structure, filing and service of bundles, whether electronic (“e-bundles”) or paper.

The consultation documents sets out 10 questions on which the Committee is particularly interested in hearing views. 

The main amendments that will be of interest to Expert Witnesses would appear to be:

  • 4.2 The list of documents that must not be inserted in the bundle. 

  • The draft PD drawing a distinction between (a) financial remedy proceedings (see Chapter 5) and (b) all other proceedings (see this Chapter 6).

  • 5.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing in proceedings for a financial remedy.

  • 6.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing other than for a financial remedy.

  • 5.3(d) and 6.3(e) Removal of the specific references to reports of a "guardian" and "litigant friend" which are set out in the existing PD 27A 4.2.

  • 10 The format of e-bundles.

  • 11 The format of paper bundles. 

Note, the draft new PD27A would not amend the existing limit of 40 pages for an expert report and 4 pages for the report's executive summary. 

The deadline for responses is 21 October 2024, with the new PD27A coming into force by Spring 2025. The EWI may provide a response to the consultation and would welcome the views of members at policy@ewi.org.uk to help inform the response. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.