New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body... New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

We have just published our new judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body complaints during a case. Our comprehensive guide is...
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation... Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation...

The claimant was suing for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of assets used in its high-pressure aluminium diecasting business. The...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher? What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher?

This case illustrates a number of difficulties for the adult victims of childhood sexual abuse. Diagnoses of psychiatric disorder in childhood have to...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A
Sean Mosby 5124

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

bySean Mosby

The Family Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A. Practice Direction 27A sets out universal practice in respect of court bundles in family proceedings in the High Court and the Family Court. 

The Committee’s aim is for a new PD27A to reflect the fact that electronic bundles are commonly used now in most family proceedings and also to bring into PD27A provisions which are currently made in judicial guidance. This guidance includes the General Guidance on electronic court bundles (29 November 2021), the Guidance on e-bundles for use in the family court and Family Division (21 December 2021) and the Statement on the Efficient Conduct of Financial Remedy Proceedings in the Financial Remedies Court (11 January 2022).

A key purpose is to ensure clarity on the process and consistency across how bundles are formulated. The Committee intends for the new PD27A to be a comprehensive source of requirements for the preparation of bundles in family proceedings, with which anyone preparing a bundle is able to comply, providing in-depth guidance on the preparation of bundles, including in relation to the content, structure, filing and service of bundles, whether electronic (“e-bundles”) or paper.

The consultation documents sets out 10 questions on which the Committee is particularly interested in hearing views. 

The main amendments that will be of interest to Expert Witnesses would appear to be:

  • 4.2 The list of documents that must not be inserted in the bundle. 

  • The draft PD drawing a distinction between (a) financial remedy proceedings (see Chapter 5) and (b) all other proceedings (see this Chapter 6).

  • 5.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing in proceedings for a financial remedy.

  • 6.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing other than for a financial remedy.

  • 5.3(d) and 6.3(e) Removal of the specific references to reports of a "guardian" and "litigant friend" which are set out in the existing PD 27A 4.2.

  • 10 The format of e-bundles.

  • 11 The format of paper bundles. 

Note, the draft new PD27A would not amend the existing limit of 40 pages for an expert report and 4 pages for the report's executive summary. 

The deadline for responses is 21 October 2024, with the new PD27A coming into force by Spring 2025. The EWI may provide a response to the consultation and would welcome the views of members at policy@ewi.org.uk to help inform the response. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.