Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

We are pleased to welcome a new Corporate Partner
Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Celebrating Success at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

Successful Certification candidates receive their certificate from Lord Hodge.
Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Range of Opinion is the focus of the 5th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast. We catch up with Colin Holburn, Chair of the EWI Membership Committee,...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...
Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A
Sean Mosby 277

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

bySean Mosby

The Family Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A. Practice Direction 27A sets out universal practice in respect of court bundles in family proceedings in the High Court and the Family Court. 

The Committee’s aim is for a new PD27A to reflect the fact that electronic bundles are commonly used now in most family proceedings and also to bring into PD27A provisions which are currently made in judicial guidance. This guidance includes the General Guidance on electronic court bundles (29 November 2021), the Guidance on e-bundles for use in the family court and Family Division (21 December 2021) and the Statement on the Efficient Conduct of Financial Remedy Proceedings in the Financial Remedies Court (11 January 2022).

A key purpose is to ensure clarity on the process and consistency across how bundles are formulated. The Committee intends for the new PD27A to be a comprehensive source of requirements for the preparation of bundles in family proceedings, with which anyone preparing a bundle is able to comply, providing in-depth guidance on the preparation of bundles, including in relation to the content, structure, filing and service of bundles, whether electronic (“e-bundles”) or paper.

The consultation documents sets out 10 questions on which the Committee is particularly interested in hearing views. 

The main amendments that will be of interest to Expert Witnesses would appear to be:

  • 4.2 The list of documents that must not be inserted in the bundle. 

  • The draft PD drawing a distinction between (a) financial remedy proceedings (see Chapter 5) and (b) all other proceedings (see this Chapter 6).

  • 5.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing in proceedings for a financial remedy.

  • 6.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing other than for a financial remedy.

  • 5.3(d) and 6.3(e) Removal of the specific references to reports of a "guardian" and "litigant friend" which are set out in the existing PD 27A 4.2.

  • 10 The format of e-bundles.

  • 11 The format of paper bundles. 

Note, the draft new PD27A would not amend the existing limit of 40 pages for an expert report and 4 pages for the report's executive summary. 

The deadline for responses is 21 October 2024, with the new PD27A coming into force by Spring 2025. The EWI may provide a response to the consultation and would welcome the views of members at policy@ewi.org.uk to help inform the response. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.