17 September 2024 Keith Rix 450 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery10. Report Writing14. Giving Oral Evidence15. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Kohler Mira Limited v Norcros Group (Holdings) Limited [2024] EWHC 3247 (Ch) Medical reporting agency at work Mantir Singh Sahota v Albinder Singh Sahota & Ors [2024] EWHC 2165 (Ch) A mother's malign influence on her children Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355 Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.