17 September 2024 Keith Rix 2431 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery16. Criticism and Complaints11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch) Some guidance for experts in professional disciplinary proceedings Experts who rise above the fray and fully discharge their duties to assist the Court Praise for experts gives insight into what makes oral evidence credible Car-Wizard Limited v Vixen Surface Treatments Limited [2026] EWHC 685 (Ch) Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.