The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink? The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

The Role of Expert Witnesses in Building Safety Disputes - An Urgent Rethink?

In this article, Rose Wilson and Mariya Rankin from Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP, and Bhavina Vasishta from Rimkus consider whether...
The mandatory duty on range of opinion The mandatory duty on range of opinion

The mandatory duty on range of opinion

The Claimant was suing in relation to profound disabilities he suffered due to the Defendant’s admitted clinical negligence. While some of the experts...
Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes

Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes

Many medical experts from a variety of specialties, but in particular accident and emergency, may be called upon to advise the court as to the nature,...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB)
Case Updates

LMN v Swansea Bay University Health Board [2025] EWHC 3402 (KB)

The claimant, who suffered brain damage at birth, relied on a report commenting on the allegation of negligence prepared by Mrs S, a midwife. The judge was concerned about the objectivity of Mrs S’s expert evidence because she was heavily involved in the business of litigation and gave evidence which he considered was uncompromisingly critical of the defendant.

Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal
Case Updates

Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary.

Woods v Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2024] EWHC 1432 (KB)