Login Join Us
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
Expert evidence and an absent defendant Expert evidence and an absent defendant

Expert evidence and an absent defendant

A defendant who chose not to attend or be represented at trial, suggested that he might still instruct his expert witness to provide oral...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

The change to the Declaration of Truth for Criminal Proceedings

The change to the Declaration of Truth for Criminal Proceedings

The second amendment updates the declaration of truth used in expert reports. From 2nd October 2023, the Forensic Science Regulator: Code of Practice will require an expert witness to declare that they have acted in accordance with their relevant code or identify areas of non-compliance and provide details of steps taken to mitigate the risks associated with the non-compliance. This amendment will ensure that the expert witness’s declaration required by the Criminal Procedure Rules is consistent with the new declaration required by the Forensic Science Regulator’s Code of Practice.

 

The new point 13 from the declaration reads: “I confirm that I have complied with the code of practice or conduct for experts of my discipline, namely [identify the code], in all respects save as identified in [schedule][annexe][x] to this report. That [schedule][annexe] gives details of the action taken to mitigate any risk of error that might arise as a result.” 

 

The above video provides clarification for Expert Witnesses, confirming that if they have complied with the relevant code of practice, they do not have to use the entire statement and can simply state: “I confirm that I have complied with the code of practice or conduct for experts of my discipline, namely [identify the code], in all respects.”
 

Previous Article Guidance for Expert Witnesses submitting reports for cases in the new Civil Intermediate Track
Next Article UI2022002729 [2023] UKAITUR UI2022002729
Print
1327
Comments are only visible to subscribers.