An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

The defendants denied the validity of a will on the grounds that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity. The judge found that the conclusion of...
Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) is intending to review its ‘Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims’ with a...
Update on EWI Advocacy Update on EWI Advocacy

Update on EWI Advocacy

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Legal Aid: Experts' Fees Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

This case is of obvious importance to experts authorised by the Family Court to be instructed in public law proceedings but it has implications for...
An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to... An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to...

An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to...

The court noted that the jointly instructed expert demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of both CPR 35 and the duties owed to the court by an...
EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an... EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

New Template: Information for people attending an appointment with an Expert
Simon Berney-Edwards 4011

New Template: Information for people attending an appointment with an Expert

bySimon Berney-Edwards

EWI is grateful to member Andrew Quaile who has shared his template with Members so they can make use of it too.

 

To provide reports of a medico-legal nature it is often necessary for claimants to attend for an interview and examination. That is obviously different to reports for the court of a non-medical nature but on occasions clients may well need to be interviewed to establish the nature of the complaint and relevant facts to allow the expert to provide an opinion for the Court.

 

It is therefore important that the claimant understands what is to occur and the reason for the appointment. In my experience claimants differ hugely in how they have been briefed by their lawyers, if at all. They can vary from refusing to answer questions, if they are attending for a report written on behalf of the defendant, to turning up late and behaving inappropriately during the interview. Very few have their thoughts organised and many ‘forget’ previous episodes of symptoms which are relevant to the case.

 

Even more frequent are comments made after the report has been provided. These are often not relevant to the opinion and usually concern the previous records, which are matters of fact and cannot be altered. Many claimants speak too quickly or incoherently and are then disappointed if everything they have said is not in the report. This is made even more difficult during remote and video consultations. Claimants very rarely have taken on board the fact that the expert is independent for the court and in order to comply with that requirement the opinion should be the same if written for the claimant or the defendant. From a medical perspective, claimants are shocked that the aging process affects them and assume that an accident is responsible for all their symptoms and subsequent treatment.

 

It, therefore, occurs to me that claimants should be briefed by their lawyers beforehand. They should not be told what to say but told what to expect. I believe that would make life easier for all sides, both claimant and defendant. Some preparation by the claimant, including a written statement, would certainly assist the process but it should not turn into a simple cut and paste process. The claimant will need examining on their account of their claim, but any claimant submissions could be attached to the report.

 

To ‘prepare’ the claimant a number of actions could be taken including sending the claimant a document explaining the methodology and reasoning behind it. In a way this is a ‘consenting’ process. This could also have a tear off strip which the claimant signs and returns to the expert indicating understanding of what will take place and agreement to engage with it.

 

I have written a template along these lines for the Expert Witness Institute which will hopefully will cover most scenarios. I am aware that this is very much an example of something which could potentially be used by the medical profession but it may also be of use by experts in other disciplines with a bit of adaption.

 

Access the template

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.