31 December 2019 Simon Berney-Edwards 2273 Case Updates Mustard v Flower [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB), 2019 WL 05104326 bySimon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: Road traffic accident. C claims that in the accident she sustained a subarachnoid brain haemorrhage and a diffuse axonal brain injury such as to have left her with cognitive and other deficits. But there are marked differences between the experts as to her presentation and the interpretation of her medical records, imaging and history. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Covert recordingNeuropsychological assessmentPart 3505. Rules and Regulations11. Responding to questions09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) How not to use AI in expert evidence Switch article Somek & Associates approved as an EWI Corporate Partner Previous Article A Local Authority v M, F, E, W, X Y Z (by their Children's Guardian) [2019] EWHC 1447 (Fam), 2019 WL 06313296 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.