31 December 2019 Simon Berney-Edwards 3409 Case Updates Mustard v Flower [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB), 2019 WL 05104326 bySimon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: Road traffic accident. C claims that in the accident she sustained a subarachnoid brain haemorrhage and a diffuse axonal brain injury such as to have left her with cognitive and other deficits. But there are marked differences between the experts as to her presentation and the interpretation of her medical records, imaging and history. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Covert recordingNeuropsychological assessmentPart 3510. Records Assessments and Site Visits06. Rules and Regulations12. Responding to questions Related articles Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) Quarterly Update on EWI's Advocacy Work Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Switch article Somek & Associates approved as an EWI Corporate Partner Previous Article A Local Authority v M, F, E, W, X Y Z (by their Children's Guardian) [2019] EWHC 1447 (Fam), 2019 WL 06313296 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.