06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 2554 Case Updates GFH Capital Ltd v Haigh [2020] 7 WLUK 405 by Priya Vaidya The case: The applicant (H) applied to vary an order for disclosure made against him following the grant of summary judgment to the respondent. In support of the application he provided medical reports in respect of a road traffic accident that he said he had been involved in in March 2020, a psychiatrist's letter that he was not in a state to give evidence or engage in legal work, a letter from his GP stating that he was receiving treatment for mental health problems, a fitness for work statement that he was signed off work for three months suffering from PTSD and a therapist's letter that he was not fit to appear in court. He subsequently alleged that his health had further deteriorated since making the application, but did not adduce any further evidence. He did not attend the hearing. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity to litigate10. Records Assessments and Site Visits11. Report Writing Related articles The Digital Footprint: An Overlooked Source of Expert Evidence — Lessons from Shaheen and Ahmed v Daish [2025] EWHC 3056 (KB) Trinsic Collagen Limited v Procoll Limited [2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch) Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Evie Toombes v Dr Mitchell [2021] EWHC 3234 (QB): Key Lessons for Expert Witnesses Across All Disciplines A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness Switch article GSTT, SLAM v R [2020] EWCOP 4, 2020 WL 00476197 Previous Article Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.