06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 2159 Case Updates GFH Capital Ltd v Haigh [2020] 7 WLUK 405 byPriya Vaidya The case: The applicant (H) applied to vary an order for disclosure made against him following the grant of summary judgment to the respondent. In support of the application he provided medical reports in respect of a road traffic accident that he said he had been involved in in March 2020, a psychiatrist's letter that he was not in a state to give evidence or engage in legal work, a letter from his GP stating that he was receiving treatment for mental health problems, a fitness for work statement that he was signed off work for three months suffering from PTSD and a therapist's letter that he was not fit to appear in court. He subsequently alleged that his health had further deteriorated since making the application, but did not adduce any further evidence. He did not attend the hearing. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity to litigate10. Records Assessments and Site Visits11. Report Writing Related articles Experts acting in conflict zones Previous criticism used to highlight defects in expert evidence A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice Switch article GSTT, SLAM v R [2020] EWCOP 4, 2020 WL 00476197 Previous Article Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.