Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or... Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or...

The judge noted that the expert readily accepted that integral to his reasoning was that he did not believe the claimant as to the symptoms he had...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert.

The 'joint statement' prepared by two blockchain experts was really two statements, one from each expert. Fabrizio D'Aloia v Persons...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work

The court found that a highly respected and hugely experienced histopathologist expert wtiness, who was overburdened with work, had made errors in his...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Can I increase fees in a long-running case - and how should I go about it?
Wiebke Morgan 1183

Can I increase fees in a long-running case - and how should I go about it?

byWiebke Morgan

Q. I have been involved in a long-running high cost negligence case. This has now gone on for several years. In the meantime my fees have increased for all new cases I have taken on. Am I permitted to raise my hourly rate and other fees such as Court attendance above those originally agreed at the start of this case several years ago, to match my current rates? Or, in the alternative am I have restricted to using these historical hourly rates?

A.

The question raises a key point of general application: experts should make sure their T&C’s reserve the right to vary hourly rates from time to time, with notice - especially as UK inflation is no longer benign. Clients may seek to fix initial rates for a period, but that period can be negotiated, or constrain the rate by which hourly rates can increase (eg no more than the rate of inflation), and that too can be negotiated.

If you do not have a clause in your T&Cs reserving the right to vary your hourly rate from time to time you could contact your instructing solicitors and negotiate an increased hourly rate, particular taking into account that the case has gone on for several years.

Your T&Cs should have a review clause in them, e.g. that they are valid until a specific date and will be reviewed, not necessarily changed after that time. You should also have a clause that rates are subject to review and may change after that time.

If the case proceeds normally there is a cost budgeting exercise that good solicitors ask the expert to fill in. You will see that there is a space for contingency which is where you might include unrated fees for specific items later in the case at that point.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.