The Medical Expert in Court The Medical Expert in Court

The Medical Expert in Court

Fans of true crime and anyone involved in giving expert evidence might be interested in a recent podcast episode from EWI Fellow, Dr Harry Brunjes.
Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4 Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4

Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4

The claimant alleged that the vibrating tools he used while employed by the defendant caused Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome. The judge criticised one of...
EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

The Expert Witness Institute has set up a new partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme which is a collaborative initiative between the...
RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th... RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

The RICS is seeking feedback from public stakeholders on the updating of its Professional Standard for Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses. The...
Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

In this case of suspected non-accidental injuries to an infant, only one of the experts was required to give evidence. This was Professor Fleming and...
DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]... DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

The Claimant brought a claim for compensation in the UK after he was hit by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Mallorca and suffered major...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Aston Risk Management Ltd v Lee Jones & Ors [2024] EWHC 252 (Ch)
Sean Mosby 2024

Aston Risk Management Ltd v Lee Jones & Ors [2024] EWHC 252 (Ch)

bySean Mosby

The Case

The judge had determined in an earlier trial that the first defendant, Mr Jones, acted in breach of his fiduciary duties as a de facto director of Audiological Support Services Limited (‘ASS’) in causing ASS to transfer a number of assets (collectively comprising its business and undertaking) to Audiological Measurement and Reporting plc at roughly the same time as ASS entered administration.

 

This trial determined questions of quantum relating to the earlier judgment of liability, including how to assess the equitable damages relating to the value of the assets wrongly transferred.

 

The independence of the expert

The only witness at the quantum trial was Mark Fairhurst, a Forensic Accounting Consultant, who gave expert evidence on behalf of the claimant in respect of the loss of the value of the business and undertaking of ASS. The defendants did not file or serve any expert evidence.

 

During the course of the hearing, the claimant voluntarily disclosed a “Preliminary Quantum Appraisal” which Mr Fairhurst had prepared for them. The defendants argued that Mr Fairhurst could not be regarded as an independent expert because he had been engaged by the claimant at an earlier stage to provide advice on the claim.

 

The judge’s determination

The judge concluded that the purpose of the Preliminary Quantum Appraisal “was merely to provide a preliminary indication from the point of view of an expert forensic accountant as to the quantum aspects of the claim as it was being formulated.”

 

The judge went on to note that, “[w]hilst the document does deal with other heads of claim than those in respect of which Mr Fairhurst was ultimately asked to provide expert evidence for the quantum trial, I do not consider that advice given thereby impinges upon Mr Fairhurst’s ability to give independent expert forensic accounting evidence for the purposes thereof. I hasten to suggest that it would not be unusual for an expert identified as a potential expert to provide an expert report for trial to be asked, at an earlier stage of the proceedings, to give a preliminary indication, or appraisal, of the issues that arise regarding quantum.”

 

The judge also found that Mr Fairhurst was a good witness who gave his evidence impartially and provided clear and considered answers, including in some cases frank answers that did not necessarily assist the claimant’s case.

 

In these circumstances, the judge did not find any proper basis for ruling Mr Fairhurst’s evidence to be inadmissible as not independent expert evidence, deciding, instead, to place very considerable weight and reliance upon it.

 

The judge also commented on Mr Jones’ decision not to obtain expert evidence. “It is unfortunate that Mr Jones does not rely upon expert evidence in response to Mr Fairhurst’s report, which might have enabled the same to have been more closely tested. It is necessary for me, without the benefit of any expert evidence from Mr Jones, to determine whether the figure arrived at by Mr Fairhurst properly represents the amount of equitable compensation that ought to be awarded under this head.”

 

Learning points

Learning points for potential instructing parties:

 

  • Always consider whether or not expert evidence is required to support your case.
  • In determining whether you need an expert witness, take care in making assumptions about your ability to discredit the opposing party’s expert evidence without the support of an expert.

 

Learning points for experts are:

 

  • Providing a preliminary indication, or appraisal, of the issues that arise regarding quantum, should not prevent an expert from subsequently acting as an expert witness in respect of the claim.
  • It is important to keep in mind that once instructed as an expert witness, the expert’s overriding duty is to court and not the party instructing them.

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.