Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm) McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

The claimant alleged that the second defendant, a Spanish racing driver, had repudiated a binding agreement under which he was contracted to drive for...
Getting paid in Scotland Getting paid in Scotland

Getting paid in Scotland

This case illustrates the factors taken into account in Scotland in deciding whether to grant an application for certification of an expert which is...
Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2 Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

The Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, chaired by Sir Brian Leveson, has just published Part 2 of the Review with 135 recommendations,...
Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB) Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB)

Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB)

The case was a group litigation concerning extensive oil pollution which affected two regions in the Niger Delta in Nigeria. The judge rejected the...
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and... Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance applies to...
Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

We have just completed the regular review of our Standard Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement. The purpose of the Terms and Conditions is...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot - Webinar and Guidance
Sean Mosby 542

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot - Webinar and Guidance

bySean Mosby

 

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot: Guidance

The Pilot for Access to Public Domain Documents (governed by Practice Direction 51ZH) was originally intended to commence in October 2025 but will now go live from 1st January 2026.

The pilot will apply to the Commercial Court (including the London Circuit Commercial Court) and the Financial List (except where a party is unrepresented and had not used the Court’s CE File electronic filing system previously). It is intended that there will be a review after 6 months although the pilot is not scheduled to finish until 31st December 2027.

If the pilot is successful, it will then be extended to other courts – most likely the Business and Property courts first.

The Pilot identifies certain documents as Public Domain Documents. It is intended to only capture documents which as a matter of law enter the public domain when a hearing takes place in public without imposing an undue burden on the parties or the Court. The Pilot will see a change from the current position, whereby an application is required to access the documents, to the default being the provision of the documents.

The main categories of documents covered by the Pilot are:

  • Written submissions – skeleton argument and written and opening closing submissions, as well as all other submissions provided to the judge during the course of the hearing

  • Witness statements/affidavits

  • Expert reports (including annexes and exhibits)

How does it work?

The documents will be accessed via CE-File which is the court’s existing system with the parties filing the documents themselves in the appropriate category.

There will be a default filing period for documents. This will be from the day they enter the public domain by being referred to in a court hearing and ending at 16:00 14 days later unless otherwise ordered or agreed by the parties.

As filing will be the default position any party who wishes to limit or not file will need to seek an order to that effect before the filing deadline (Filing Modification Orders – FMOs).

The PD contains a provision for an order to be made compelling parties to make the filing and could, if not complied with, result in appropriate sanctions such as contempt of court.

It will be the responsibility of the lawyers to upload the documents. Further information can be found in the accompanying Guidance Note.
 

Things to Note:

The most important thing is to be aware that if you are acting in a case which comes under the Pilot then your report will become a Public Domain Document once your evidence is given in open court. If the hearing is private, then the report will not become a Public Domain Document.

All Experts should read and familiarise themselves with both the Practice Direction and the Guidance.

Although the current scope of the Pilot is limited it is likely that in the future this will apply across the board in the civil courts and your reports will automatically become Public Domain Documents.

You should:

  • Check with the instructing party whether the case will be dealt with under the pilot.

  • Discuss with the instructing party when your report will be first used or referred to. It is likely that this will be when you give evidence in chief and this will be when it becomes publicly available.

  • Discuss with your instructing party about how any sensitive information might be used in your report and how they would like it dealt with.

  • Do not include your own personal information, other than that which is required by the procedural rules.  For example, consider not including email or telephone numbers. Remember to use your business address and not your personal one. It maybe that you consider having a separate registered business address if you work from home.

  • Consider your personal media profile and the information that is publicly available - especially if it is likely that your report could led to harassment or social media comments.

The Committee intends to review the Pilot after 6 months of operation. We would appreciate any details of your experiences with the Pilot to inform our engagement with the Committee’s review.  
 

Webinar

For further information, you can check out our free member Webinar.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.