Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

Board is now engaging on its proposed Key Objectives. The Key Objectives represent the high-level outcomes that, once finalised, will guide the...
An unsafe conviction with flawed DNA evidence An unsafe conviction with flawed DNA evidence

An unsafe conviction with flawed DNA evidence

In this Bermudan case, the appellant successfully appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council to have his convictions quashed because of...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Non-freezing cold injury Non-freezing cold injury

Non-freezing cold injury

This was one case brought to trial in the multi-claimant non-freezing cold injury (NFCI) litigation. The case illustrates the challenges for...
One tray short of a baker’s dozen: injury on the production line One tray short of a baker’s dozen: injury on the production line

One tray short of a baker’s dozen: injury on the production line

This case concerns an important boundary matter that sometimes arises for orthopaedic experts in relation to biomechanics and ergonomics. These are...
Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

Procedure for Determining Mental Capacity in Civil Proceedings

A Civil Justice Council working group has published a report setting out recommendations for the development of a procedure for determing mental...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...
Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

Thomas Murray Joins EWI as a Corporate Partner

We are pleased to welcome a new Corporate Partner
Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion

Range of Opinion is the focus of the 5th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast. We catch up with Colin Holburn, Chair of the EWI Membership Committee,...
A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

A Day in the Life of a Water Quality Expert

Tim White is a chartered chemist who uses his expertise to assess chemical risk from exposure to water. He has been an Expert Witness for over 40...
Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives
Sean Mosby 33

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

bySean Mosby

 

Transparency and Open Justice Board

The Lady Chief Justice established the Transparency and Open Justice Board in April 2024. The purpose of the Board is to lead and coordinate the promotion of transparency and open justice across the Courts and Tribunals in England & Wales.

Key Objectives

After establishing a Stakeholder Committee, in which the EWI is participating, the Board is now engaging on its proposed Key Objectives. The Key Objectives represent the high-level outcomes that, once finalised, will guide the Board’s work. They will be used to identify areas where changes can and should be made, as well as to measure the outcomes from any change programme.

After finalising the Key Objectives, the Board will promote them by engaging with all Courts and Tribunals and asking them to carry out an evaluation of the extent to which their current practice and procedure achieve the Key Objectives. Where they do not do so, the relevant Courts and Tribunals will be asked to formulate a change programme that would lead to the Key Objectives being realised. The Board has indicated that it will also support the same approach being taken in the reserved tribunals in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Fundamental components of open justice

The Board has based the Key Objectives on what it believes to be the four fundamental components of open justice:

  1. Open courts,

  2. Open reporting,

  3. Open decisions, and

  4. Open documents.

The Board notes that where a sufficiently weighty countervailing factor is convincingly established, Courts and Tribunals may be required to derogate from open justice on a case by case basis. The Board also recognises that there are important issues as to the stage of proceedings in which a core document should be publicly available, although this would be reflected in the implementing procedural rules rather than the Key Objectives which are focussed on the principle as to what documents should be available.

The Board’s questions

The Board has invited responses to the proposed Key Objectives by answering three questions:

  1. Do you agree that these are the correct objectives? 

  2. Do you think there is something that has been missed from the objectives? If yes, what else do you think should be included?

  3. Do you think there is something that has been included within the objectives that shouldn't be? If yes, what? 

The closing date for responses is 28 February 2025.

The EWI will be responding to the engagement on the proposed Key Objectives and would appreciate hearing your view at policy@ewi.org.uk. We will also be in touch directly with members who indicated in our recent survey on ‘Developments in Expert Practice’ that they were happy to discuss this with us further.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.