Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149 Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149

Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149

The Secretary of State for the Home Office was appealing the decision of the First Tier Tribunal (‘FTT’) to allow the Respondent’s...
How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations

How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations

Tasib, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 139 (Admin) makes for interesting reading because it...
UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of... UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body... New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

We have just published our new judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body complaints during a case. Our comprehensive guide is...
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives
Sean Mosby 2252

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

bySean Mosby

 

Transparency and Open Justice Board

The Lady Chief Justice established the Transparency and Open Justice Board in April 2024. The purpose of the Board is to lead and coordinate the promotion of transparency and open justice across the Courts and Tribunals in England & Wales.

Key Objectives

After establishing a Stakeholder Committee, in which the EWI is participating, the Board is now engaging on its proposed Key Objectives. The Key Objectives represent the high-level outcomes that, once finalised, will guide the Board’s work. They will be used to identify areas where changes can and should be made, as well as to measure the outcomes from any change programme.

After finalising the Key Objectives, the Board will promote them by engaging with all Courts and Tribunals and asking them to carry out an evaluation of the extent to which their current practice and procedure achieve the Key Objectives. Where they do not do so, the relevant Courts and Tribunals will be asked to formulate a change programme that would lead to the Key Objectives being realised. The Board has indicated that it will also support the same approach being taken in the reserved tribunals in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Fundamental components of open justice

The Board has based the Key Objectives on what it believes to be the four fundamental components of open justice:

  1. Open courts,

  2. Open reporting,

  3. Open decisions, and

  4. Open documents.

The Board notes that where a sufficiently weighty countervailing factor is convincingly established, Courts and Tribunals may be required to derogate from open justice on a case by case basis. The Board also recognises that there are important issues as to the stage of proceedings in which a core document should be publicly available, although this would be reflected in the implementing procedural rules rather than the Key Objectives which are focussed on the principle as to what documents should be available.

The Board’s questions

The Board has invited responses to the proposed Key Objectives by answering three questions:

  1. Do you agree that these are the correct objectives? 

  2. Do you think there is something that has been missed from the objectives? If yes, what else do you think should be included?

  3. Do you think there is something that has been included within the objectives that shouldn't be? If yes, what? 

The closing date for responses is 28 February 2025.

The EWI will be responding to the engagement on the proposed Key Objectives and would appreciate hearing your view at policy@ewi.org.uk. We will also be in touch directly with members who indicated in our recent survey on ‘Developments in Expert Practice’ that they were happy to discuss this with us further.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.