06 June 2024 Keith Rix 1384 Case Updates The Cahill v Seepersad [2023] IEHC 583 byKeith Rix The Case Brigid Seepersad died tragically in a road traffic. An issue in the case was the valuation of the nursing home premises she operated. Both sides engaged expert witnesses to assist the court in relation to financial calculations. From the outset, the plaintiff objected in strenuous terms to the independence of the defendants’ financial expert and to the admissibility of his evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags Expert evidenceIndependenceDuties of the ExpertIreland06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 A fundamentally flawed report Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Online Procedure Rule Committee Consultation: Inclusion framework and pre-action model Switch article When it is advisable to decline instructions Previous Article M v N (Approved) [2023] IEHC 759 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.