10 June 2022 Priya Vaidya 2055 Case Updates Palmer v Mantas [2022] EWHC 90 (QB) byPriya Vaidya The case: The Claimant's claim arose out of a road traffic accident. Many different symptoms manifested after the accident, which it was accepted were caused or materially contributed by it which were physical, neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric in origin and summarised as tinnitus, sound sensitivity, hearing difficulties, dizziness and migrainous headaches associated with increased sensitivity to light and sound. The parties further agreed that the Claimant was suffering from chronic pain and/or Somatic Symptom Disorder with predominant persistent pain; a generalised anxiety disorder and specific phobic anxiety; recurrent periods of clinically significant depression amounting to a major depressive episode which fluctuated depending on her other symptoms, in particular the migrainous headaches; post-traumatic stress disorder To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert bias11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence Email chains, gross misconduct and the experts who count the cost Should a solicitor use track changes on my expert report Switch article Cox, R (On the Application Of) v The Oil and Gas Authority [2022] EWHC 75 (Admin) Previous Article Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.