10 June 2022 Priya Vaidya 1552 Case Updates Palmer v Mantas [2022] EWHC 90 (QB) byPriya Vaidya The case: The Claimant's claim arose out of a road traffic accident. Many different symptoms manifested after the accident, which it was accepted were caused or materially contributed by it which were physical, neurological, neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric in origin and summarised as tinnitus, sound sensitivity, hearing difficulties, dizziness and migrainous headaches associated with increased sensitivity to light and sound. The parties further agreed that the Claimant was suffering from chronic pain and/or Somatic Symptom Disorder with predominant persistent pain; a generalised anxiety disorder and specific phobic anxiety; recurrent periods of clinically significant depression amounting to a major depressive episode which fluctuated depending on her other symptoms, in particular the migrainous headaches; post-traumatic stress disorder To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert bias10. Report Writing14. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Switch article Cox, R (On the Application Of) v The Oil and Gas Authority [2022] EWHC 75 (Admin) Previous Article Radia v Marks [2022] EWHC 145 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.