Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,... Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,...

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports,...

The Annual Sir Michael Davies Lecture for 2025 was held on 15 October at the RAF Club in London. The Right Honourable Lady Simler, Justice of the...
Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC) Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

The Claimants alleged that dust, noise and odour emitted by the defendant’s factory over a prolonged period constituted a legal nuisance. The...
Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Her appointment was announced at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on Wednesday 15th October.. 
Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

The award was made at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on the 15th of October.
Impact speed and risk of injury Impact speed and risk of injury

Impact speed and risk of injury

There are some general learning points for all experts but otherwise this is for neurosurgeons. It is another road traffic accident personal injury...
A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

Julie Andrews is a consultant Speech and Language Therapist providing assessments for Special Educational Need (SEND) tribunals and writing...
Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Following last month’s case update by Professor Keith Rix of Brown v Morgan Sindall, several experts have offered further reflections on the use...
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Non-freezing cold injury
Keith Rix 1374

Non-freezing cold injury

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This was one case brought to trial in the multi-claimant non-freezing cold injury (NFCI) litigation. The parties had been assisted by generic experts who were then called as experts in this case. Each was cross-examined on the basis that they displayed a lack of impartiality. But the court was satisfied that each of them understood their duty under Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules and sought to comply with it. Given that each had provided generic evidence for one side or the other, the court did not find it surprising that they had continued to be instructed. In itself, that did not prevent them giving objective evidence.

The case illustrates the challenges for experts when the clinical condition in issue is rarely encountered (or at least rarely recognised) in normal NHS practice. It most commonly arises in military personnel. Furthermore, there has been limited high quality, peer-reviewed research in the area of NFCI. Understanding of the condition continues to evolve. The pool of those with expertise in the condition is relatively small. The precise mechanism of injury is not currently known to medical science. Neither of the lead experts had military experience. One was challenged over his lack of clinical experience of NFCI and the other had seen only a few patients with NFCI outside medicolegal reporting. Nevertheless, both were able to assist the court. Significantly, it was apparent that both had kept themselves informed about developments in the field

In many cases where there is conflicting expert evidence, the court has to rely on an impressionistic view that one expert is generally to be preferred to the other and where one expert has been criticised this may be taken into account. However, in this case, notwithstanding the criticisms she made of one of the experts, the court was able to set aside those criticisms and base her judgment on a careful analysis of how the expert opinions fitted with the other evidence in the case.

The detail of this judgment may be of interest only to neurologists and vascular surgeons but makes useful reading for any expert instructed in a case where non-freezing cold injury is in issue. 

What the judgment does not reveal is that the claimant failed to beat the defendant’s Part 36 offer and that there had also been a failed joint settlement meeting in the case.

Learning points:

General

  • Although findings of fact are for the court and not for the experts, the court expects experts to take on board what they hear in evidence and to think about whether that alters their opinion in any material way. The main point of an expert medical witness being present while a claimant gives evidence is so that they have heard that evidence first hand and can weigh it in giving their opinion evidence.

  • Look carefully not only at the claimant's evidence but also at the histories underpinning the other experts’ opinions and cross-reference contemporaneous records. Reflect sufficiently on any inconsistencies between the history you have obtained and other sources of evidence including the evidence heard at trial.

  • Even expert witnesses may find the experience of being cross-examined challenging and different people react in different ways to that.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.