EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme

The Expert Witness Institute has set up a new partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme which is a collaborative initiative between the...
RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th... RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

RICS consultation on Professional Standard for Surveyors acting as Expert Witnesses - 5th...

The RICS is seeking feedback from public stakeholders on the updating of its Professional Standard for Surveyors Acting as Expert Witnesses. The...
Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children

In this case of suspected non-accidental injuries to an infant, only one of the experts was required to give evidence. This was Professor Fleming and...
The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate... The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute and Expert Insight Announce Strategic Partnership to Elevate...

The Expert Witness Institute, the UK’s leading body for expert witnesses, is proud to announce a new partnership with Expert Insight, a...
DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]... DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025]...

The Claimant brought a claim for compensation in the UK after he was hit by an uninsured driver while on holiday in Mallorca and suffered major...
Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners

This is an important case for three reasons. First, it found that a general practitioner, giving evidence about the depressive disorder diagnosed...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees
Keith Rix 802

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This case is of obvious importance to experts authorised by the Family Court to be instructed in public law proceedings but it has implications for all experts whose fees are to be paid by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA).

Although the judgment makes clear what criteria (exceptional circumstances) are to be met for the LAA to grant prior authority to instruct an expert where the fees or hours exceed those set out in the Remuneration Regulations or Guidance, the criteria, i.e. (a) complexity and (b) the specialised and unusual nature of the material will probably be familiar to many experts who have sought to justify their hourly rate and / or their estimated number of hours on the basis of the complexity and the specialised and unusual nature of the material. 

Experts will also be familiar with concept of a market place and aware that consideration will be given to instructing the expert whose hourly rate and / or estimated number of hours is / are the lowest. Experts should therefore have regard to Table 1 in the amended 'Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses in Family Cases' (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67ecea97632d0f88e8248b83/Guidance_on_Remuneration_of_Expert_Witnesses_v11__April_2025_.pdf ) which specified for different experts the number of hours above which prior authority should be applied for.

It is not surprising that in deciding which expert to instruct, the commissioner will be influenced by the expert’s breakdown of their estimate. Experts who have filed away detailed time sheets will have the advantage of being able explain why they estimate a particular number of hours for different stages in the process of report production. Details can be provided of mean and maximum numbers of hours.   

As to complexity, the expert may have a view but the court will be likely to have its view on the basis of the extent to which courts in similar cases have required expert assistance and the nature of the expertise that has been required having regard to the complexity of the case for the court. The idea of ‘seniority’ is potentially significant. On the one hand it must already be the case that those commissioning reports decide that they need an expert “like (= as senior as) Dr X”. What may happen is that some experts, once they have been instructed at least once at an enhanced hourly rate, in seeking to negotiate fees, will state explicitly that they have been instructed as a ‘senior expert’ or on the basis of their seniority in the field or imply as much. It will be unfortunate if the concept of ‘senior expert’ is widely and explicitly adopted, if parties can submit that their expert’s evidence should be accepted in preference to another expert because their expert is a ‘senior expert’.

Although the term ‘full information’ is used in relation to whether the internal LAA procedures (including any review) have been followed, experts should have this in mind when negotiating instructions not just in LAA-funded cases but in any case.   

Case

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.