Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) is intending to review its ‘Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims’ with a...
Update on EWI Advocacy Update on EWI Advocacy

Update on EWI Advocacy

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Legal Aid: Experts' Fees Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

This case is of obvious importance to experts authorised by the Family Court to be instructed in public law proceedings but it has implications for...
EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an... EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD

The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD

In this road traffic accident case where there was a claim for psychiatric injury, the two psychiatric experts produced between them 14 reports,...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Is baldness a disease?
Keith Rix 709

Is baldness a disease?

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

Mr Simon Britten, immediate past chair of the British Orthopaedic Association Medico-legal Committee, in his foreword to the forthcoming Expert Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Evidence, refers to how giving evidence one Monday in a case of tibial fracture, missed compartment syndrome and subsequent amputation, he was asked when he had last fixed a tibial fracture. Understandably, he said that the judge’s reaction to his answer ‘last Friday’ appeared to be a promising start. However, it is not a hard and fast rule that the healthcare expert should have experience, or recent experience, of performing the procedure or operation in issue. This case illustrates it. So do the following cases, all discussed in the forthcoming Expert Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Evidence.

In ZZZ v Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 1642 (QB), where a spinal surgeon said that he had not performed spinal surgery for more than six years, the judge thought that that in itself might be of no significance, especially in a case which related to treatment more than six years previously (but for other reasons he did have grave doubts as to whether the surgeon had the necessary expertise).

In LK [2020] CSIH 40 there was an objection to a midwife called as an expert witness, on the basis that she lacked knowledge and understanding of the day to day demands on a practising midwife. She accepted for example that it was some time since she herself had delivered a baby. However, she had a detailed knowledge of policy and procedure, there was evidence of her continuing involvement in the provision of care and she was the line manager for the senior charge midwives. It was accepted that she had skilled evidence that would assist the Fitness to Practise Committee of the Nursing and Midwifery Council and that it was based on a reliable body of knowledge or experience.  

In Negus v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust  [2021] EWHC 643 (QB), a clinical negligence claim relating to aortic valve replacement surgery performed in 2014, the judge had no doubt that an expert who had retired from clinical practice as a consultant cardiothoracic surgeon in 2011, and last performed an aortic valve replacement in June 2011, continued to be aware of the standards appropriate to his specialism, not least given his role as Chairman of the Royal Papworth Hospital. Furthermore, whilst another expert did not recall having personally undertaken an aortic valve replacement enlargement, the judge had no doubt as to his understanding of that procedure, still less as to his skill and experience relating to aortic valve replacement surgery more generally.

The details of this judgment are unlikely to be of interest to healthcare experts other than dermatologists and perhaps cosmetic surgery. However, there are number of learning points of general application relating to ‘hands on’ experience, medical terminology, classification, cited literature and guidelines.

Learning points:   
  • It is not a hard and fast rule that the healthcare expert should have experience, or recent experience, of performing the procedure or operation in issue. However, in the absence of such experience, it is necessary to evidence and demonstrate a clear understanding of the nature of the condition or injury and its treatment.

  • When provided with a hearing bundle in a case where you rely on published literature, check that all of your cited publications are in the bundle. If they are not, inform your instructing solicitors and ensure that you take copies to court in case they are not added to the hearing bundle.

  • When relying on published guidelines, be prepared for cross-examination as to their relevance, their application, how they were devised and also who devised them. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Definitions that are given from the perspective of persons engaged in medical practice can have a different meaning to that adopted in ordinary and natural English usage (as in the Oxford English Dictionary). Have regard to both.

  • If you rely on a classification such as the International Classification of Diseases, be able to explain its purpose.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.