When can you challenge an Expert Determination? When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

When can you challenge an Expert Determination?

The outcome of an Expert Determination is final and binding. However, there are circumstances in which the outcome can be appealed. The case of GSY...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

Whether you are just starting out as an Expert Witness or an experienced Expert Witness looking to increase the number of instructions you are...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Although the detail of McIntyre, R v [2026] NICC 2 will probably be of importance only for forensic science imagery analysts, it is important for...
DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Justice Council – Experts Committee Symposium – 12 October 2022
Wiebke Morgan 2966

Family Justice Council – Experts Committee Symposium – 12 October 2022

byWiebke Morgan

A reflection of the day by Wiebke Morgan, Membership Manager (having watched the event remotely)

 

The main session of the  Symposium, hosted by Mr Justice Williams,  gave an overview on the implementation of the recommendations made in the final report of the working group on Experts in the Family Justice System (published on 5 November 2020) and also looked at steps ahead. While the Symposium was aptly sub-titled ‘The Long and Winding Road’, nonetheless, as Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division and chair of the Family Justice Council, remarked in his opening address, significant progress has been made.

 

It also  featured talks on related issues such as the concern over expertise of  psychology experts in alienation and domestic abuse cases. Dr Jaime Craig made the point that the FJC/BPS guidance was very clear: A psychologist expert should either be an academic psychologist chartered with BPS or a practitioner, HCPC registered psychologist.

 

Kath Halliday, President of the Royal College of Radiologists, reflected on her experience as expert witness. Dr Jo Gifford RCPH, in her presentation on how research papers inform expert evidence made the point that when doctors and judges use the term ‘evidence’ they are defining it very differently.

 

Prof  Keith Rix, a Fellow of the Expert Witness Institute, and member of our Membership Committee,  gave a thought-provoking overview on recent cases, highlighting lessons that should be learned. I encourage you to read his case updates which are regulary updated in our Knowledge Hub - there are alway extremely relevant learning points!

 

In the afternoon, there were 4 break-out groups on the following subjects:

 

  1. NHS, Commissioners and Royal Colleges and professional bodies [Dr Fiona Straw, Dr Adam Oates and Dr Neil Stoodley]
     
  2. Payment recommendations [Lead by Maud Davis]
     
  3. Training and the role of Royal Colleges [Lead by Prof Keith Rix and Sharon Segal]
     
  4. Court processes and treatment of experts [HHJ Sharpe and Williams J]

 

The groups reported back at the end of the day and the overall sense was one of optimism about the prospects of making further progress in implementing the recommendations.

 

This was a day packed full of information and positive contributions. I was struck (but not surprised) by the hard work and commitment shown by all participants, and I feel they have taken great strides on the long and winding road. If you are interested in the work of the Group you can read more at: https://www.judiciary.uk/family-justice-council/experts-in-the-family-justice-system-efjs/

 

About the Family Justice Council
The primary role of the Family Justice Council (operational since 2004) is to promote an interdisciplinary approach to family justice and to monitor the system. The Council, a non-statutory, advisory non-departmental public body, monitors how effectively the system, both as a whole, and through its component parts, delivers the service that the public need. It advises on reforms necessary for continuous improvement.

 

For information about the work of the Council please visit the website: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/advisory-bodies/fjc

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.