An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

An ounce of reasoning is worth a pound of opinion

The defendants denied the validity of a will on the grounds that the testatrix lacked testamentary capacity. The judge found that the conclusion of...
Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) is intending to review its ‘Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims’ with a...
Update on EWI Advocacy Update on EWI Advocacy

Update on EWI Advocacy

One of the key roles of the Expert Witness Institute (‘EWI’) is to ensure that policy, rule and regulatory changes are informed by the...
Legal Aid: Experts' Fees Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

Legal Aid: Experts' Fees

This case is of obvious importance to experts authorised by the Family Court to be instructed in public law proceedings but it has implications for...
An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to... An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to...

An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to...

The court noted that the jointly instructed expert demonstrated a clear lack of understanding of both CPR 35 and the duties owed to the court by an...
EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an... EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

EWI Annual Conference 2025: Opening keynote looks at how to be a witness as well as an...

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Justice Council – Experts Committee Symposium – 12 October 2022
Wiebke Morgan 2035

Family Justice Council – Experts Committee Symposium – 12 October 2022

byWiebke Morgan

A reflection of the day by Wiebke Morgan, Membership Manager (having watched the event remotely)

 

The main session of the  Symposium, hosted by Mr Justice Williams,  gave an overview on the implementation of the recommendations made in the final report of the working group on Experts in the Family Justice System (published on 5 November 2020) and also looked at steps ahead. While the Symposium was aptly sub-titled ‘The Long and Winding Road’, nonetheless, as Sir Andrew McFarlane, President of the Family Division and chair of the Family Justice Council, remarked in his opening address, significant progress has been made.

 

It also  featured talks on related issues such as the concern over expertise of  psychology experts in alienation and domestic abuse cases. Dr Jaime Craig made the point that the FJC/BPS guidance was very clear: A psychologist expert should either be an academic psychologist chartered with BPS or a practitioner, HCPC registered psychologist.

 

Kath Halliday, President of the Royal College of Radiologists, reflected on her experience as expert witness. Dr Jo Gifford RCPH, in her presentation on how research papers inform expert evidence made the point that when doctors and judges use the term ‘evidence’ they are defining it very differently.

 

Prof  Keith Rix, a Fellow of the Expert Witness Institute, and member of our Membership Committee,  gave a thought-provoking overview on recent cases, highlighting lessons that should be learned. I encourage you to read his case updates which are regulary updated in our Knowledge Hub - there are alway extremely relevant learning points!

 

In the afternoon, there were 4 break-out groups on the following subjects:

 

  1. NHS, Commissioners and Royal Colleges and professional bodies [Dr Fiona Straw, Dr Adam Oates and Dr Neil Stoodley]
     
  2. Payment recommendations [Lead by Maud Davis]
     
  3. Training and the role of Royal Colleges [Lead by Prof Keith Rix and Sharon Segal]
     
  4. Court processes and treatment of experts [HHJ Sharpe and Williams J]

 

The groups reported back at the end of the day and the overall sense was one of optimism about the prospects of making further progress in implementing the recommendations.

 

This was a day packed full of information and positive contributions. I was struck (but not surprised) by the hard work and commitment shown by all participants, and I feel they have taken great strides on the long and winding road. If you are interested in the work of the Group you can read more at: https://www.judiciary.uk/family-justice-council/experts-in-the-family-justice-system-efjs/

 

About the Family Justice Council
The primary role of the Family Justice Council (operational since 2004) is to promote an interdisciplinary approach to family justice and to monitor the system. The Council, a non-statutory, advisory non-departmental public body, monitors how effectively the system, both as a whole, and through its component parts, delivers the service that the public need. It advises on reforms necessary for continuous improvement.

 

For information about the work of the Council please visit the website: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/advisory-bodies/fjc

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.