29 November 2024 Keith Rix 3056 Case Updates Expert appoints herself as social worker, psychologist, therapist and judge by Keith Rix Commentary At a time when psychologists in particular are concerned about psychological evidence being given by psychologists who are unregulated, this case illustrates the risks when an ‘independent’ social worker gives psychological evidence. The learning points are of general application. The specifics of the case are for psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers. Learning Points Do not allow your own experiences and interests and your sympathy for the subject to cloud your judgment Keep your personal experiences out of your testimony Opinions need to be evidence-based. Have regard to the totality of the evidence. Expert investigation of a case should be in-depth and accurate. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags IndependenceUnregulated Experts16. Criticism and Complaints06. Rules and Regulations Related articles Cleveland Potash Limited v The Honourable Mrs Ferelith Drummond & Ors [2026] EWHC 1182 (Ch) A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch) Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James Pickersgill [2026] EWCC 48 Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person Switch article T (Fresh Evidence on Appeal), Re [2024] EWCA Civ 1384 Previous Article One tray short of a baker’s dozen: injury on the production line Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.