Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355 Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355

Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355

The Claimant alleged that the Defendant acted negligently in obtaining her consent for laser eye surgery including failing to adequately investigate...
A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness

Colin Holburn is an EWI fellow, governor and founding member. A consultant in accident and emergency medicine, he has been practising as an Expert...
NMC Health PLC v Ernst & Young LLP [2024] EWHC 3021 (Comm) NMC Health PLC v Ernst & Young LLP [2024] EWHC 3021 (Comm)

NMC Health PLC v Ernst & Young LLP [2024] EWHC 3021 (Comm)

The defendant made an application for adjournment on the proposition that it could not be ready for trial because its experts required additional time...
Government Response on Revisions to the Medical  Reporting Process for Road  Traffic... Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

Government Response on Revisions to the Medical Reporting Process for Road Traffic...

The Government has published its response to the consultation it ran from 18 July to 10 October 2023 on 'Revisions to the Medical Reporting...
Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion

In the 8th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss re-evaluating your opinion. We look at possible reasons why you might wish to re-evaluate...
Justice for people with a hearing impairment Justice for people with a hearing impairment

Justice for people with a hearing impairment

A psychiatrist whose evidence had often been admitted in capacity cases was assisted in this case of a hearing-impaired person by an interpreter who...
Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

Family Court reporting pilot to be extended nationally

The Family Procedure Rule Committee has approved a proposal to roll-out the family court reporting pilot nationally, through changes to the Family...
New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

New Immigration and Asylum Practice Direction

The new Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal came into force on 1 November 2024. The Practice Direction...
Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024

In the last podcast for 2024, we look back at the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over the course of 2024, and highlight the...
Day in the Life of a Financial Expert Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Day in the Life of a Financial Expert

Uwe Wystup is a practitioner in the field of foreign exchange options, as well as a senior academic, trainer, and judge. He is the founder of...
Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

Podcast Episode 6: In Conversation with Giles Eyre

In the 6th Episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon talks with retired Barrister and expert witness trainer, Giles Eyre, who is retiring as an EWI...
A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness

Sue Lightman is a Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmologist who has been undertaking medicolegal Expert Witness work for over 20...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

EWI Annual Conference 2020 Review
Simon Berney-Edwards 2683

EWI Annual Conference 2020 Review

bySimon Berney-Edwards

An appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE, Barrister at Law and Mediator , Richmond Green Chambers

 

The strange times we live in throw up inventive new ways to conduct our legal business: working from home (WFH).  None more so than attending the Expert Witness Institute (EWI) Annual Conference for 2020 held remotely for the first time.  And it was a great success with first class speeches, panel discussions and “breakout sessions”.

 

Amanda Stevens, the Conference Chair, began these historic proceedings almost as though they were a regular occurrence.  It was a busy and detailed programme aiming as always to cater for current issues which experts face.  Predominant is the mystique surrounding “virtual” or “remote” hearings which seem now to be a regular fixture for future litigation.

 

We heard first from Lord Kerr in one of his last remaining duties as a Supreme Court Justice giving the keynote address. Brian Kerr was the last of the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary and he holds a life peerage enabling him to remain in the House of Lords on retirement.  His reflections on the legal changes he has seen were fascinating, bridging the gap between the Lords as an appellate committee, to the emerging UKSC. And the remote system for the keynote speech worked well.

 

The morning sessions covered what will probably be the most useful for the comments and observations on how we will now use virtual meetings, hearings, and trials for the foreseeable future.  The chair of the Bar Council for 2020, Amanda Pinto QC, and the vice-chair of the Personal Injuries Bar Association, Sarah Crowther QC, opened an interactive session on “Covid-19: How the Pandemic shaped the role of technology in the courts”.  There was so much commonsense advice on display that it is worth watching any of the available conference videos to catch the suggestions.

 

Probably the most important points which EWI members will take with them include the need for more than one computer when you undertake remote work.  That is because you need one screen for the hearing itself, either via the Cloud Video Platform (CVP) for similar systems such as zoom, skype or teams.  You then need a separate screen for the trial bundle which you cannot turn, or cross refer to in quite the same way as the paper version.  Finally, always have a mobile phone as (sadly) it is common for one party or another to lose a connection during the hearing.

 

To reinforce Pinto and Crowther, we were given “lessons from the courts- a panel discussion” chaired by Dr Penny Cooper, with Alexander Hutton QC, Mrs Justice McGowan, and HHJ Nigel Lickley QC from the Old Bailey.  Experts will notice how top heavy the conference was with barristers so far. However, they proved the justification of their invitations with some great forensic tips for our new remote age. And at no stage did any of their cats run over the keyboards of their PCs to disrupt proceedings!  Apart from animals or others contributing to virtual chats, there was also the recurring comments on the appropriateness (or otherwise) of the backgrounds- books rather than beds being the favoured option.

 

Networking and exhibitor sessions were useful dividers between the formal discussions.  We were lucky to have contributions from Bond Solon, Redwood Collections, and the New Law Journal.  The afternoon breakout sessions covered the more “bread and butter” sessions which I am sure members found useful for their professional updates, including these areas: improving practice in inquests; in arbitration; and post-Brexit.  

 

The final panel session brought back Penny Cooper for a discussion on “Lawyers and Experts: bringing together Experts and Instructing Parties” with contributions from Duncan Hughes-Phillips, Frank Hughes, Jennifer Jones, and Robert Clayton.

 

We missed EWI chair, Martin Spencer, this year although his welcome note was spot on- little did we know how appropriate the conference theme “bridging the gap” might be! We did end the conference knowing how we could improve our practice and develop our skills to make us fit for the future as lawyers and experts.  And I think we all now know what to expect for the 2021 and that the next Conference, whether it is virtual or attended, will always remain professionally rewarding for everyone at the EWI.  

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.