15 February 2021 Priya Vaidya 705 Case Updates Bankole-Jones v Watford Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3100 (Admin) byPriya Vaidya The case: A statutory appeal under the Housing Act 1996, s 204 ("the 1996 Act") against a decision of the Respondent local authority to the effect that the Appellant was homeless and eligible for assistance, but that he was not in priority need. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Commentary: This case did not involve expert psychiatric evidence although the local authority’s reviewing officer had evidence as to the appellant’s mental health from primary care and mental health services. However, expert psychiatric evidence is sometimes obtained in such cases. Learning point: Where there is an issue as to homelessness assistance under the Housing Act 1996, the test for vulnerability arising from mental illness or handicap is a functional test: if there is a mental illness or handicap, make it clear whether or not, and if so to what extent and in what way, this affects the person’s ability to cope with homelessness. Share Print Tags Legal testPsychiatryVulnerability05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Switch article R v Weldemaryam [2020] EWCA Crim 1616 Previous Article R (IJ (Kosovo)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] EWHC 3487 (Admin) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.