05 September 2025 Sean Mosby 49 Case Updates Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4 bySean Mosby Summary The claimant alleged that the vibrating tools he used while employed by the defendant caused Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome. The judge criticised one of the medical experts for looking for answers that supported his strong views on the subject, rather than obtaining a reliable history from the claimant. Learning points Keep an open mind and avoid looking for answers that support your views rather than obtaining a reliable history from the claimant. It is especially important to be mindful of this when you are dealing with a subject where you have strong views. Unless there are good reasons not to do so, be willing to defer to the opposing expert if they have specialist expertise in an area where you do not. Expect the opposing expert to afford you the same respect. Make sure that you are completely familiar with the regulations and guidance applicable to the case. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion12. Responding to questions13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and ComplaintsHand-Arm Vibration Syndrome Related articles The Medical Expert in Court Investigating possible non-accidental injuries in children DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2025] EWHC 2002 (KB) Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB) What does deterioration mean? Switch article EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme Previous Article The Medical Expert in Court Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.