05 September 2025 Sean Mosby 4007 Case Updates Andrew Lunt v BAC Impalloy Ltd [2025] EWCC 4 bySean Mosby Summary The claimant alleged that the vibrating tools he used while employed by the defendant caused Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome. The judge criticised one of the medical experts for looking for answers that supported his strong views on the subject, rather than obtaining a reliable history from the claimant. Learning points Keep an open mind and avoid looking for answers that support your views rather than obtaining a reliable history from the claimant. It is especially important to be mindful of this when you are dealing with a subject where you have strong views. Unless there are good reasons not to do so, be willing to defer to the opposing expert if they have specialist expertise in an area where you do not. Expect the opposing expert to afford you the same respect. Make sure that you are completely familiar with the regulations and guidance applicable to the case. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and ComplaintsHand-Arm Vibration Syndrome11. Report Writing14. Changing your opinion12. Responding to questions13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of practice Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Switch article EWI partnership with the Pro Bono Expert Support Scheme Previous Article The Medical Expert in Court Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.