Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Clarifying the role of validity testing in expert evidence

Following last month’s case update by Professor Keith Rix of Brown v Morgan Sindall, several experts have offered further reflections on the use...
Read between the lines, judge Read between the lines, judge

Read between the lines, judge

Familiar to all experts, this case illustrates how personal injury claimants can attempt to maximise their claim by dishonestly reporting symptoms and...
John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70 John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70

John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70

The person insured by the defendant drove his motorcycle into the pursuer’s parked lorry causing the pursuer, who claimed he was standing on the...
Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025 Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Resolve and EWI held our annual Scottish Medicolegal Conference at the Grand Central Hotel in Glasgow on 19 September. The event featured great...
Your expert witness CV is not the same as a professional CV Your expert witness CV is not the same as a professional CV

Your expert witness CV is not the same as a professional CV

Top tips and new support available to ensure you remain complaint and provide a good quality CV.
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
The Medical Expert in Court The Medical Expert in Court

The Medical Expert in Court

Fans of true crime and anyone involved in giving expert evidence might be interested in a recent podcast episode from EWI Fellow, Dr Harry Brunjes.
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer
Keith Rix 1896

An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is a case in which the tribunal was critical of an expert witness. One criticism was that he did not expressly acknowledge the guidance provided in the Ikarian Reefer in his declaration – “a step taken by many experts who prepare reports for this Chamber”. I do not recall seeing a declaration that refers to the Ikarian Reefer per se, but the point is that the ‘extended’ declarations advocated by Bond Solon, The Academy of Experts and the Expert Witness Institute are based in part on the Ikarian Reefer.

I have often referred to having seen an expert report that gave no indication as to the name of the expert. I know that many people have found this hard to believe. Well, it has happened again.  

Learning points:

General

  • The expert should provide clarity as to, and relevant details of, their instructions (‘the substance of all material instructions’).

  • An expert should be able to explain why some time after their original report has been prepared, and in the absence of any further assessment of the subject, they have been instructed to provide a second report (‘the substance of all material instructions’).

  • Assessments of non-English speaking patients facilitated by an interpreter pose specific communication challenges to all participants. There will be concern that important diagnostic and relational cues are lost because of the way original speech is rendered by language interpreters.

  • Identify with clarity the language in which the subject completed any questionnaires.

  • Where someone has assisted the subject in completing any questionnaires, the expert has to engage in detail with the extent to which the answers were the subject’s own, or a hybrid coupled with their assistant’s personal understanding of their circumstances, and the assistant’s understanding as to what the subject was endeavouring to say.

  • Discounting test scores which do not accord with the expert’s expectation as to their likely outcome because of the appellant's limited English language skills but being content to rely upon others where conclusions are favourable to the subject's case, requires an explanation.

  • 'Sources of Information' (or ‘Documents and materials’) should be accurate and complete, in particular as to the medical records considered.

  • The expert’s name should not be missing from the report; an unintelligible signature is not sufficient.

  • An expert who is a professor should indicate the institution at which the professorship is held or by which it is awarded.

  • An expert who opines in general terms on facts outside their purported area of expertise must provide an explanation as to the foundations of their opinion.

Immigration and asylum

  • Asylum and human rights claims are different matters.

  • Expert or other evidence produced in asylum and immigration matters should not encroach on a tribunal's identification of whether a well-founded fear of persecution and/or the risk of a breach of protected rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 arise.

  • A declaration is required, whether or not referring specifically to the Ikarian Reefer, to the effect that the expert has complied with its requirements as to expert evidence.

  • An expert should be able to explain, if it be so, why they consider him/herself capable of presenting factual evidence to a tribunal on the provision of health care in a country in which they do not work.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.