The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025

The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee has published a new consolidation of the Criminal Procedure Rules and an accompanying guide. The new Rules will...
Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives

The Transparency and Open Justice Board has published its final Key Objectives and its response to its Public Engagement on the proposed Key...
A fundamentally flawed report A fundamentally flawed report

A fundamentally flawed report

The parties unanimously agreed that the report of a Court appointed expert was fundamentally flawed, could not be relied upon, and a new psychologist...
Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and... Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

Referral of Release Decisions Consultation: proposed amendments to CPR Part 77 and...

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on proposed amendments to the Civil Procedure Rules Part 77 and the Practice...
Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk

Although this is an orthopaedic case and in which given its preliminary nature the expert evidence was not tested, it is helpful for experts in...
Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC... Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC...

Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC...

The barrister for the Claimant was unable to explain to the court's satisfaction why she had cited several non-existent cases in pleadings. The...
Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025

In the 14th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Marketing and Events Manger, Heather George, reflect on their highlights from...
A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Town Planning Expert Witness

Susan Jones, founder of SJ Consultancy, has been a town planning consultant for over 40 years. As an Expert Witness, she provides evidence at public...
Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

Podcast Episode 13: Long-Standing Policy Issues

In the 13th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at five long-standing policy issues that have had significant developments recently: (1)...
A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness

Dr. Rohit Seth is trained in Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hair Transplant Surgery with over 20 years of surgical experience. A practicing...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer
Keith Rix 975

An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer

byKeith Rix

 

Commentary

This is a case in which the tribunal was critical of an expert witness. One criticism was that he did not expressly acknowledge the guidance provided in the Ikarian Reefer in his declaration – “a step taken by many experts who prepare reports for this Chamber”. I do not recall seeing a declaration that refers to the Ikarian Reefer per se, but the point is that the ‘extended’ declarations advocated by Bond Solon, The Academy of Experts and the Expert Witness Institute are based in part on the Ikarian Reefer.

I have often referred to having seen an expert report that gave no indication as to the name of the expert. I know that many people have found this hard to believe. Well, it has happened again.  

Learning points:

General

  • The expert should provide clarity as to, and relevant details of, their instructions (‘the substance of all material instructions’).

  • An expert should be able to explain why some time after their original report has been prepared, and in the absence of any further assessment of the subject, they have been instructed to provide a second report (‘the substance of all material instructions’).

  • Assessments of non-English speaking patients facilitated by an interpreter pose specific communication challenges to all participants. There will be concern that important diagnostic and relational cues are lost because of the way original speech is rendered by language interpreters.

  • Identify with clarity the language in which the subject completed any questionnaires.

  • Where someone has assisted the subject in completing any questionnaires, the expert has to engage in detail with the extent to which the answers were the subject’s own, or a hybrid coupled with their assistant’s personal understanding of their circumstances, and the assistant’s understanding as to what the subject was endeavouring to say.

  • Discounting test scores which do not accord with the expert’s expectation as to their likely outcome because of the appellant's limited English language skills but being content to rely upon others where conclusions are favourable to the subject's case, requires an explanation.

  • 'Sources of Information' (or ‘Documents and materials’) should be accurate and complete, in particular as to the medical records considered.

  • The expert’s name should not be missing from the report; an unintelligible signature is not sufficient.

  • An expert who is a professor should indicate the institution at which the professorship is held or by which it is awarded.

  • An expert who opines in general terms on facts outside their purported area of expertise must provide an explanation as to the foundations of their opinion.

Immigration and asylum

  • Asylum and human rights claims are different matters.

  • Expert or other evidence produced in asylum and immigration matters should not encroach on a tribunal's identification of whether a well-founded fear of persecution and/or the risk of a breach of protected rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 arise.

  • A declaration is required, whether or not referring specifically to the Ikarian Reefer, to the effect that the expert has complied with its requirements as to expert evidence.

  • An expert should be able to explain, if it be so, why they consider him/herself capable of presenting factual evidence to a tribunal on the provision of health care in a country in which they do not work.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.