Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

The Family Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A on court bundles.
The Single Biggest Change White Paper The Single Biggest Change White Paper

The Single Biggest Change White Paper

Earlier this year, we asked our members about the single biggest change they’ve seen since they started practicing as an Expert Witness. With...
Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal

This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic...
Episode 4: Expert Fees Episode 4: Expert Fees

Episode 4: Expert Fees

Simon and Sean discuss expert fees and catch up with Dominic Woodhouse from Partners in Costs to talk about cost management and budgeting in civil...
Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and... Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

Forensic Science Regulator issues updated Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has updated its Guidance on Declarations of Compliance and Non-Compliance with the Forensic Science Regulator: Code of...
Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

Known unknowns and the non-accidental injury hypothesis

The detail of this judgment will mainly be of interest to paediatricians, radiologists and clinical pharmacologists as it is another case in which...
The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law

This is an important case because it corrects a misunderstanding about the test for capacity. There has been an established view that the Mental...
A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

A Day in the Life of a Fitted Kitchen and Bathroom Expert

Jerry Ponder uses his 40+ years of experience in fitted interiors to provide expert evidence on the design, product quality, installation and project...
Episode 3: Single Joint Expert Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Episode 3: Single Joint Expert

Simon and Sean discuss Single Joint Experts and catch up with two EWI members who act as Single Joint Experts to hear about their experiences, the...
A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

A Day in the Life of a Forensic Engineering Expert

Tom Magner provides independent technical assistance as an Expert Witness. Specialising in the forensic investigation of mechanical, electrical, and...
Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness... Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Episode 2: The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry and the importance of Expert Witness...

Simon and Sean discuss the importance of Expert Witness training in the context of Gareth Jenkins' evidence at the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry...
A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

A Day in the Life of an Expert Witness in Electrical Engineering and Construction

Efstathios Maliakis is senior electrical engineer with 20 years’ experience, including 10 years supervising the construction of power plants. A...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A
Sean Mosby 22

Family Procedure Rule Committee Consultation on New Draft Practice Direction 27A

bySean Mosby

The Family Procedure Rule Committee ('Committee') is consulting on a new draft Practice Direction 27A. Practice Direction 27A sets out universal practice in respect of court bundles in family proceedings in the High Court and the Family Court. 

The Committee’s aim is for a new PD27A to reflect the fact that electronic bundles are commonly used now in most family proceedings and also to bring into PD27A provisions which are currently made in judicial guidance. This guidance includes the General Guidance on electronic court bundles (29 November 2021), the Guidance on e-bundles for use in the family court and Family Division (21 December 2021) and the Statement on the Efficient Conduct of Financial Remedy Proceedings in the Financial Remedies Court (11 January 2022).

A key purpose is to ensure clarity on the process and consistency across how bundles are formulated. The Committee intends for the new PD27A to be a comprehensive source of requirements for the preparation of bundles in family proceedings, with which anyone preparing a bundle is able to comply, providing in-depth guidance on the preparation of bundles, including in relation to the content, structure, filing and service of bundles, whether electronic (“e-bundles”) or paper.

The consultation documents sets out 10 questions on which the Committee is particularly interested in hearing views. 

The main amendments that will be of interest to Expert Witnesses would appear to be:

  • 4.2 The list of documents that must not be inserted in the bundle. 

  • The draft PD drawing a distinction between (a) financial remedy proceedings (see Chapter 5) and (b) all other proceedings (see this Chapter 6).

  • 5.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing in proceedings for a financial remedy.

  • 6.2 The more detailed requirements which apply to a bundle, including expert reports, for a hearing other than for a financial remedy.

  • 5.3(d) and 6.3(e) Removal of the specific references to reports of a "guardian" and "litigant friend" which are set out in the existing PD 27A 4.2.

  • 10 The format of e-bundles.

  • 11 The format of paper bundles. 

Note, the draft new PD27A would not amend the existing limit of 40 pages for an expert report and 4 pages for the report's executive summary. 

The deadline for responses is 21 October 2024, with the new PD27A coming into force by Spring 2025. The EWI may provide a response to the consultation and would welcome the views of members at policy@ewi.org.uk to help inform the response. 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.