21 January 2026 Sean Mosby 2042 Case Updates Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report by Sean Mosby Summary The Court excluded consideration of the expert testimony of an expert on the dangers of AI and misinformation, after he submitted an expert declaration which included fake AI-generated citations to two academic articles. Learning points Learning points for experts Don’t use an AI tool unless you fully understand it. Consider seeking training if you are not fully confident with the tool. Generative AI tools can be extremely useful for research, but it is vital to verify the information they provide. Don’t assume that, because the AI generated material is in your area of expertise, you will be able to pick up any errors ‘by eye’. If you haven’t already, review our article on How not to use AI in expert evidence and listen to our podcast on AI and the Expert Witness. Be cautious in citing an academic article that you haven’t read. Learning points for instructing parties Ask the experts you instruct if, and if so how, they intend to use AI in preparing their expert evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment How not to use AI in expert evidence Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Share Print Tags 16. Criticism and ComplaintsArtificial IntelligenceAI11. Report WritingMinnesotaUnited States Related articles KS v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/64221/2024 Cleveland Potash Limited v The Honourable Mrs Ferelith Drummond & Ors [2026] EWHC 1182 (Ch) A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness Expert Report or MG11 form? Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch) Switch article Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) Previous Article New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.