05 September 2024 Keith Rix 941 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles A fundamentally flawed report Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence Email chains, gross misconduct and the experts who count the cost An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to the court Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.