Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service  Board:... Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board:...

The decision in O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board [2025] CSOH 17 provides important guidance on the legal and professional standards...
Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal

At a recent Frontier Economics Litigation event, the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, The Honourable Mrs Justice Bacon, warned that...
EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports

“If an Expert, a lawyer, an accountant, an engineer, a doctor produce inaccurate or unreliable opinions or use hallucinatory references, they are...
Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion

The Claimant suffered serious injuries in a road traffic accident after the Defendant, who was driving out of a side road, collided with the...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...
New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness

The EWI has just published its new guide to Becoming and Expert Witness. Written by EWI Member Paul Beckett, the guide is aimed at those who are...
Ill-health and sentencing Ill-health and sentencing

Ill-health and sentencing

After summarising the case law, the court in this case stated that there is a high threshold to be reached in order for ill health or physical...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we preview the EWI  Annual Conference which will be held virtually on 19 June 2026. We look at some of...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.
Sean Mosby 1622

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.

by Sean Mosby

Lady Simler presenting the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

The Annual Sir Michael Davies Lecture for 2025 was held on 15 October at the RAF Club in London. The Right Honourable Lady Simler, Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered an insightful lecture on Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives, which was summed up perfectly by EWI Chair Sir Martin Spencer as the blueprint for providing the best written and oral expert evidence.

Intoduction

Lady Simler set the scene for her lecture by noting the importance of the highest quality standards and impartiality of expert witnesses in the context of increasing scientific sophistication, growing public awareness of forensic limitations, and evolving legal standards. Bodies such as the EWI are critical to ensuring Expert Witnesses give the best evidence they can as interpreters of their expert disciplines and act as a bridge between the laboratory and the courtroom.

A fundamental challenge Experts face is serving two masters: satisfying the rigour of their expert discipline while, at the same time, communicating effectively with legal professionals and a lay audience. The Expert must have the ability to think like a scientist while speaking like an educator.

 

Enhancing written reports

Lady Simler discussed practical ways Expert can enhance their written reports.

  1. The structure of a written report is critically important.

    • Reports should be well structured with a logical format that is easy to navigate, including numbered paragraphs, headings and sub-headings.

    • Your summary should answer the fundamental questions.

    • Your methodology section should give an account of the decisions you made and the reasons why.

  2. Clarity should be at the forefront of your mind.

    • Use cautious, precise language.

    • Use short sentences and the active rather than the passive voice.

    • Avoid the use of jargon, explain technical terms, and use those terms consistently.

    • Think about how you might use visual information.

  3. Confidence in your report is essential.

    • Acknowledge the limitations of your role and your conclusions.

    • Explain the uncertainties that surround your conclusions and make it clear when you can’t reach a definite conclusion.

 

Enhancing oral evidence

Lady Simler then turned to advice about giving oral evidence.

  1. Your goal in oral evidence is to ensure the lay audience understands your conclusions and the reliability of the process that led to them.

  2. Preparation and technique can make all the difference.

    • Good preparation should make you ready to explain how you have reached every conclusion you have reached.

    • Ensure that you’ve understood any analysis you’ve relied on, and any key assumptions on which it depends.

  3.  Try to anticipate areas of challenge and how you might explain your answer.

  4. Depending on the case, it might help to create a comprehensive case file including your technical analysis, relevant scientific literature, validation studies and clear explanations of any novel techniques you have used.

  5. Be prepared to discuss peer review status of your methods and any ongoing scientific debates that are relevant to your conclusions. 

  6. Critically, if you need to change your opinion its far better to be upfront rather than remain silent in hope it isn’t spotted by the other side or raised in cross-examination.

  7. If possible, attend at least part of the trial before giving your evidence.

 

Strategies for surviving cross-examination

Cross-examination is designed to test both your technical knowledge and your confidence and reliability, looking to damage or remove some of the internal building blocks that support your opinion.

  1. Think through those internal building blocks in your report as part of your preparation.

  2. Use the other side’s expert report to test your assumptions and analysis.

  3. Nervousness is understandable but can lead to mistakes:

    • Speak slowly and clearly, judge the pace of your delivery by ensuring that the judge’s pen is keeping up with you.

    • Pause before answering questions.

    • Don’t guess – ask for clarification if you don’t fully understand the question and never be afraid to say that you don’t know the answer.

    • Listen to the question you have been asked and answer only that question, not the question you wished you had been asked.  

    • Keep your answers short and direct.

    • Don’t be defensive.

  4. Your answers to cross-examination should be structured, logical, well-reasoned, while remaining neutral and objective.

    • If asked a binary question, answer yes/no with a but, if you need to qualify your answer.

    • Giving evidence if not a memory test. You are entitled to refer back to your report.

    • Don’t be afraid to say you don’t know.

    • Politely decline if asked to speculate about something beyond your expertise.

    • Recognise that you are not the advocate. Your overriding duty to the court should be the fundamental principle that guides every aspect of your role.

 

Continuing professional development

Lady Simler concluded by discussing how improving your written and oral evidence also depends on strengthening your role as an independent Expert in whom the legal system can place confidence.

  1. Stay up-to-date with developments in your field, maintain active involvement in professional organisations, such as the EWI, attend confernces, etc. 

  2. Leverage scientific advances while ensuring their appopriate application and keep informed of the scientific and academic debates which surround these new technologies. 

  3. Develop data management systems to ensure the integrity and accessiblity of that material.

  4. Your continuing clinical and practical experience can also be very significant. 

  5. Actively seek feedback on your written reports and your evidence from the legal professionals with whom you work. 

  6. Think about joining continuing legal education programmes. 

  7. Consider opportunities to mentor a more junior Expert Witness. 

We highly recommend watching Lady Simler’s full lecture and the Q&A session that follows. The video is available in the EWI webshop at: https://www.ewi.org.uk/Web-Shop#!prod/7347ceef-a6ad-f011-bbd3-7ced8d6ca5a8/curr/GBP

We would like to thank Lady Simler for her insightful lecture, MAPS Medical for sponsoring the lecture, and all the members and non-members who joined us for an insightful and enjoyable evening.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.