Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents

Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents

The Civil Justice Council (‘CJC’) has published an Interim Report and Consultation on the Use of AI for preparing court documents. The...
Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th... Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th...

Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th...

The claimants, who own a property adjoining with the properties of the defendants, complained that the defendants engaged in various acts of trespass...
Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22 : Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm) McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm)

The claimant alleged that the second defendant, a Spanish racing driver, had repudiated a binding agreement under which he was contracted to drive for...
Getting paid in Scotland Getting paid in Scotland

Getting paid in Scotland

This case illustrates the factors taken into account in Scotland in deciding whether to grant an application for certification of an expert which is...
Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2 Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

Independent Review of the Criminal Courts: Part 2

The Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, chaired by Sir Brian Leveson, has just published Part 2 of the Review with 135 recommendations,...
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and... Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance applies to...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.
Sean Mosby 909

Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives.

bySean Mosby

Lady Simler presenting the Sir Michael Davies Lecture

The Annual Sir Michael Davies Lecture for 2025 was held on 15 October at the RAF Club in London. The Right Honourable Lady Simler, Justice of the Supreme Court, delivered an insightful lecture on Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives, which was summed up perfectly by EWI Chair Sir Martin Spencer as the blueprint for providing the best written and oral expert evidence.

Intoduction

Lady Simler set the scene for her lecture by noting the importance of the highest quality standards and impartiality of expert witnesses in the context of increasing scientific sophistication, growing public awareness of forensic limitations, and evolving legal standards. Bodies such as the EWI are critical to ensuring Expert Witnesses give the best evidence they can as interpreters of their expert disciplines and act as a bridge between the laboratory and the courtroom.

A fundamental challenge Experts face is serving two masters: satisfying the rigour of their expert discipline while, at the same time, communicating effectively with legal professionals and a lay audience. The Expert must have the ability to think like a scientist while speaking like an educator.

 

Enhancing written reports

Lady Simler discussed practical ways Expert can enhance their written reports.

  1. The structure of a written report is critically important.

    • Reports should be well structured with a logical format that is easy to navigate, including numbered paragraphs, headings and sub-headings.

    • Your summary should answer the fundamental questions.

    • Your methodology section should give an account of the decisions you made and the reasons why.

  2. Clarity should be at the forefront of your mind.

    • Use cautious, precise language.

    • Use short sentences and the active rather than the passive voice.

    • Avoid the use of jargon, explain technical terms, and use those terms consistently.

    • Think about how you might use visual information.

  3. Confidence in your report is essential.

    • Acknowledge the limitations of your role and your conclusions.

    • Explain the uncertainties that surround your conclusions and make it clear when you can’t reach a definite conclusion.

 

Enhancing oral evidence

Lady Simler then turned to advice about giving oral evidence.

  1. Your goal in oral evidence is to ensure the lay audience understands your conclusions and the reliability of the process that led to them.

  2. Preparation and technique can make all the difference.

    • Good preparation should make you ready to explain how you have reached every conclusion you have reached.

    • Ensure that you’ve understood any analysis you’ve relied on, and any key assumptions on which it depends.

  3.  Try to anticipate areas of challenge and how you might explain your answer.

  4. Depending on the case, it might help to create a comprehensive case file including your technical analysis, relevant scientific literature, validation studies and clear explanations of any novel techniques you have used.

  5. Be prepared to discuss peer review status of your methods and any ongoing scientific debates that are relevant to your conclusions. 

  6. Critically, if you need to change your opinion its far better to be upfront rather than remain silent in hope it isn’t spotted by the other side or raised in cross-examination.

  7. If possible, attend at least part of the trial before giving your evidence.

 

Strategies for surviving cross-examination

Cross-examination is designed to test both your technical knowledge and your confidence and reliability, looking to damage or remove some of the internal building blocks that support your opinion.

  1. Think through those internal building blocks in your report as part of your preparation.

  2. Use the other side’s expert report to test your assumptions and analysis.

  3. Nervousness is understandable but can lead to mistakes:

    • Speak slowly and clearly, judge the pace of your delivery by ensuring that the judge’s pen is keeping up with you.

    • Pause before answering questions.

    • Don’t guess – ask for clarification if you don’t fully understand the question and never be afraid to say that you don’t know the answer.

    • Listen to the question you have been asked and answer only that question, not the question you wished you had been asked.  

    • Keep your answers short and direct.

    • Don’t be defensive.

  4. Your answers to cross-examination should be structured, logical, well-reasoned, while remaining neutral and objective.

    • If asked a binary question, answer yes/no with a but, if you need to qualify your answer.

    • Giving evidence if not a memory test. You are entitled to refer back to your report.

    • Don’t be afraid to say you don’t know.

    • Politely decline if asked to speculate about something beyond your expertise.

    • Recognise that you are not the advocate. Your overriding duty to the court should be the fundamental principle that guides every aspect of your role.

 

Continuing professional development

Lady Simler concluded by discussing how improving your written and oral evidence also depends on strengthening your role as an independent Expert in whom the legal system can place confidence.

  1. Stay up-to-date with developments in your field, maintain active involvement in professional organisations, such as the EWI, attend confernces, etc. 

  2. Leverage scientific advances while ensuring their appopriate application and keep informed of the scientific and academic debates which surround these new technologies. 

  3. Develop data management systems to ensure the integrity and accessiblity of that material.

  4. Your continuing clinical and practical experience can also be very significant. 

  5. Actively seek feedback on your written reports and your evidence from the legal professionals with whom you work. 

  6. Think about joining continuing legal education programmes. 

  7. Consider opportunities to mentor a more junior Expert Witness. 

We highly recommend watching Lady Simler’s full lecture and the Q&A session that follows. The video is available in the EWI webshop at: https://www.ewi.org.uk/Web-Shop#!prod/7347ceef-a6ad-f011-bbd3-7ced8d6ca5a8/curr/GBP

We would like to thank Lady Simler for her insightful lecture, MAPS Medical for sponsoring the lecture, and all the members and non-members who joined us for an insightful and enjoyable evening.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.