Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia and litigation capacity Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia and litigation capacity

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dyslexia and litigation capacity

In short, the case illustrates a very common situation in which, on the basis of what is often an appropriately diagnosed psychological condition or...
Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor Revenue & Anor Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor Revenue & Anor

Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor Revenue & Anor

The Claimant claimed he had suffered a substantial loss due to the destruction of two consignments of poppy heads by the Defendants. The parties were...
Medical evidence and clearance for a dependent elderly relative to enter the UK Medical evidence and clearance for a dependent elderly relative to enter the UK

Medical evidence and clearance for a dependent elderly relative to enter the UK

If, which is not clear, medical evidence that assists in the application of the adult dependent relative provisions as to entrance clearance for...
Update to Legal Aid Agency Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses Update to Legal Aid Agency Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses

Update to Legal Aid Agency Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses

The Legal Aid Agency ('LAA') have updated their Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses.

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

R v Grusza In the Crown Court, Cambridge, November 2021, unreported
Priya Vaidya 1095

R v Grusza In the Crown Court, Cambridge, November 2021, unreported

byPriya Vaidya

The case: A homicide (matricide) in which the defendant was charged with murder and the defences advanced were diminished responsibility manslaughter and insanity. The prosecution instructed Dr X. The defence instructed two experts, Dr A and Dr B. 

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.