R v BRM [2022] EWCA Crim 385

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

R v BRM [2022] EWCA Crim 385
Priya Vaidya 2782

R v BRM [2022] EWCA Crim 385

byPriya Vaidya

The case: The applicant was born on 25 February 2007. He has just passed his fifteenth birthday. In July 2021 he, together with another boy of similar age, was convicted of one count of murder. 

Grounds of appeal: (1) the judge erred in ruling that psychiatric evidence relating to the applicant's diagnosis of Asperger's/ASD was not admissible to the issue of intent; (2) the judge erred in ruling that the served psychiatric evidence was inadmissible as to the first limb of self-defence; (3) the judge erred in not granting an adjournment for the defence to obtain a further report from the instructed psychiatrist.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.