16 October 2023 Wiebke Morgan 779 Case Updates OXR v Mid and South Essex Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 2006 (KB) byWiebke Morgan The judge did not find either expert compelling overall. Each had changed their initial view on significant issues without offering cogent reasons for doing so. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to judgement Share Print Tags NegligenceMedical expertENT surgery13. Changing your opinion12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements Related articles When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB) Podcast Episode 5: Range of Opinion Switch article Astley (A minor) v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2023] EWHC 1921 (KB) Previous Article Jennings v Otis Ltd [2023] EWHC 2039 (KB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.