22 April 2025 Keith Rix 2244 Case Updates Not a bridge too far – dental negligence byKeith Rix Commentary The detail of this case is of relevance to dental experts and attention is drawn to the clarity and particularity with which Professor Harding set out the instances of treatment of the Claimant which was below the standard she could reasonably have expected and then identified the consequences thereof. There is a gastroenterological and pharmacological dimension to the case because it was alleged, and found, that the pain resulting from the negligent dental treatment necessitated treatment with NAISDs which caused ischaemic colitis. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags CausationDentistryConsent10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsBridgeImplantIschaemic ColitisNSAID11. Report Writing Related articles Alison Marie Tarrant v Simon Monkhouse [2025] EWHC 2576 (KB) Personal injury litigation in Ireland A Day in the Life of a Paramedical Skin Camouflage Expert Witness Aaron Haley v Newcold Ltd [2025] EWCC 57 Fixed Recoverable Costs Interim Implementation Stocktake Switch article Pacemaker PTSD? Previous Article Does the face fit? Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.