22 April 2025 Keith Rix 2563 Case Updates Not a bridge too far – dental negligence byKeith Rix Commentary The detail of this case is of relevance to dental experts and attention is drawn to the clarity and particularity with which Professor Harding set out the instances of treatment of the Claimant which was below the standard she could reasonably have expected and then identified the consequences thereof. There is a gastroenterological and pharmacological dimension to the case because it was alleged, and found, that the pain resulting from the negligent dental treatment necessitated treatment with NAISDs which caused ischaemic colitis. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags CausationDentistryConsent10. Records Assessments and Site VisitsBridgeImplantIschaemic ColitisNSAID11. Report Writing Related articles Civil Justice Council Consultation on Use of AI for Preparing Court Documents Moulding -v- BSA Group (SW) Ltd & others, HHJ Berkley, County Court at Bristol 16th January 2026 A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness McLaren Indy LLC & Anor v Alpa Racing USA LLC & Ors [2026] EWHC 110 (Comm) Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB) Switch article Pacemaker PTSD? Previous Article Does the face fit? Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.