Login Join Us
O v O [2023] EWFC 161 O v O [2023] EWFC 161

O v O [2023] EWFC 161

A Single Joint Expert caused difficulties by an unwise pre-hearing exchange with one of the parties in the absence of the other party, and...
A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

A spotlight on... the Post Office Horizon Scandal

We’re starting a new EWI series with A spotlight on… the Post Office Horizon Scandal which looks at how the Post Office failed to listen...
Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB) Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

Wambura v Barrick TZ Ltd [2023] EWHC 2582 (KB)

The case involved the question of whether the claimants should have permission to call expert security evidence.
Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

Civil Procedure Rule Committee: Alternative Dispute Resolution consultation

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee is consulting on proposed changes to the Civil Procedure Rules to ensure that courts consider alterative...
A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and... A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

A Day in the Life of a Threat, Risk and Harm Consultant, Expert Evidence Trainer, and...

EWI Honorary Fellow Tony Saggers has been a drug trafficking Expert Witness since 1995, alongside a career in law enforcement that spanned 30 years....
Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

Forensic Science Regulator consultation on the code of practice

The Forensic Science Regulator is consulting on the draft for the development of version 2 of the forensic science code of practice.

News

McLennan v General Medical Council [2020] CSIH 12 [2020] 4 WLUK 119
Simon Berney-Edwards
/ Categories: Case Updates

McLennan v General Medical Council [2020] CSIH 12 [2020] 4 WLUK 119

Nature of case: A consultant appealed against decisions of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal finding that she had been dishonest in a report for an employment tribunal (ET). The employee alleged that he had been discriminated against on the basis of disability when he had been dismissed. The ET, guided by the expert's report, found that he did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Previous Article Mitrasinovic v Stroud [2020] EWHC 914 (QB), 2020 WL 01894725
Next Article University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust v MB [2020] EWHC 882 (QB), [2020] 4 WLUK 117
Print
1044
Comments are only visible to subscribers.