15 December 2020 Priya Vaidya 2328 Case Updates Lisle-Mainwaring v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2020] EWHC 2617 (Ch), 2020 WL 05995240 by Priya Vaidya The case: The issue was of Mr Bennett attending the trial as a witness. Under CPR 33.2 the party intending to rely on his statement instead of calling him to give oral evidence had to give the reason why he was not going to be called. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Psychiatry10. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Lessons for Expert Witnesses from O'Neill v Scottish Ambulance Service Board: Independence, Expertise and the Boundaries of Expert Opinion in Remote Clinical Triage Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness Ill-health and sentencing Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Switch article Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited v Wyeth LLC [2020] EWHC 2636 (Pat), 2020 WL 06065614 Previous Article Michelle Leach v North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2914 (QB), 2020 WL 06384316 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.