23 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 2766 Case Updates Kwikbolt Limited v Airbus Operations Limited [2021] EWHC 732 (IPEC) by Wiebke Morgan The case: A patent case Judgment as to the conduct of the expert witnesses: Mr Vanhegan's submissions on Mr X as a witness mirrored those of Mr Ward on Mr Y: he was a good witness in cross-examination doing his best to help the court, but his report was not satisfactory. Each legal team was, by implication, accusing the other of having an overbearing influence on its expert. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert's behaviour11. Report Writing08. Working with Instructing Parties Related articles Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Switch article R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 Previous Article Towuaghantse v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 681 (Admin) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.