Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant

Rough or inappropriate handling of an infant

As in many family cases, the issue here was the cause of the child’s injuries. It includes a distinction to be made between handling in...
Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate

Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate

For the specialists this case illustrates how the court investigates case of perplexing presentations in children and the importance of considering as...
Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning... Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning...

Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning...

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published guidance for professionals and litigants who represent themselves on the use of covert recordings in...
Access to public domain documents pilot Access to public domain documents pilot

Access to public domain documents pilot

The Civil Procedure Rule Committee has approved in principle a 2-year pilot on “access to public domain documents” in the Commercial...
How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims

How to Reduce the Re-traumatisation of Claimants in Medico-Legal Litigation Claims

The EWI has been provided with a copy of a recently written paper setting out the risk of re-traumatising claimants in medico-legal litigation and...
A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness

Ryan Shields is a digital forensics expert who has worked in the police and private sector. Here, he explains why he is passionate about using his...
Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements

In the 12th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss Expert Discussions and Joint Statements. Joint Statements are critical documents in any...
Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch) Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)

Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)

The claimants, who carried on a business breeding falcons, made allegations of harassment and nuisance against their neighbour, who operated a small...
Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness

In the 11th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at how AI is being used by Expert Witnesses. We discuss general developments related...
A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert

Chris Cox is a professional heritage consultant, specialist interpreter of aerial imagery and Lidar data, and an Expert Witness. She is the...
Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

Podcast Episode 10: Equal Representation for Expert Witnesses

In Episode 10 of the Expert Matters Podcast we celebrate International Women's Day. Women are appointed or testify in only 9% of disputes...
A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Accountancy Expert Witness

Heather Rogers is an accountant, tax practitioner and Expert Witness. Most of her cases involve director disputes or professional negligence where...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings
Wiebke Morgan 517

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings

byWiebke Morgan

These come into effect on 28th April 2025

Practice direction HC132 provides for the establishment of a dedicated Clinical Negligence List within the Dublin Personal Injuries List of the High Court. This is intended to ensure clinical negligence matters receive focussed attention by experienced judges and that they benefit from enhanced case management.

This list will be managed by a High Court judge and will apply to all stages of clinical negligence proceedings.

The judge in charge can:

  • set timetables for the exchange of expert reports;
  • make directions for mediation;
  • make orders relating to witness statements or expert evidence; and
  • issue any other directions necessary to ensure fair and prompt resolution of proceedings.

New procedure for applying for a trial date

Practice direction HC131 introduces a new procedure for applying for a trial date in clinical negligence proceedings. The aim of the new procedure is to ensure cases are properly pleaded before a trial date is assigned and to facilitate the earlier resolution of clinical negligence actions. This should in turn decrease legal costs.

Under the new procedure, a party seeking to apply for a trial date must give the other parties 28 days’ notice of their intention to do so and must also complete a Certificate of Compliance for the Court. The requirement to complete such a certificate is a new requirement.

In the Certificate of Compliance, the party applying for a trial date must certify that:

  • they have fully pleaded all aspects of their case;
  • they have exchanged a complete schedule of all witnesses, factual and expert (or have offered to do so);
  • they have exchanged all expert reports intended to be relied upon at trial (or offered to do so); and
  • they undertake to offer mediation within 3 weeks of the date on which the trial date is fixed and to engage in mediation within 6 weeks of the offer being accepted. This requirement to offer mediation in this framework is new and we expect that this will lead to the earlier resolution of claims.

The High Court can refuse an application for a trial date if the applicant fails to comply with these requirements or fails to comply with an order of the Court or agreement between the parties relating to pleadings, discovery or otherwise.

The other party or parties can contest the application for a trial date, in which case the Court will treat the application as a case management hearing.

After a trial date has been fixed, if a party delivers further particulars, expert reports or a schedule of special damages without the consent of the Court, the opposing parties can apply for an adjournment of the trial date. The Court can make such costs order as it considers appropriate where an adjournment is deemed necessary.  

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.