Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with Expert Witnesses in Aviation

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

New EWI guidance on Marketing your Expert Witness Practice

Whether you are just starting out as an Expert Witness or an experienced Expert Witness looking to increase the number of instructions you are...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge. Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Premex responds to JXX v Archibald [2026] by creating new service charge.

Experts on Premex's panel have contacted the EWI to say that they will be subject to a15% service charge (plus VAT) on all invoices from 1 May...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in Northern Ireland; a tale of two experts

Although the detail of McIntyre, R v [2026] NICC 2 will probably be of importance only for forensic science imagery analysts, it is important for...
DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert), Re [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2)

This case, in the Court of Protection, concerned whether a wealthy, elderly man lacked capacity. The judgment dealt primarily with an application by...
Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

Expert evidence in a vacuum of facts and startling use of Smart Glasses by the claimant

In straying from their original instructions, the expert developed an opinion without all the facts of the case and the second claimant was being...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings
Wiebke Morgan 2799

Irish High Court introduces two new practice directions designed to streamline clinical negligence proceedings

byWiebke Morgan

These come into effect on 28th April 2025

Practice direction HC132 provides for the establishment of a dedicated Clinical Negligence List within the Dublin Personal Injuries List of the High Court. This is intended to ensure clinical negligence matters receive focussed attention by experienced judges and that they benefit from enhanced case management.

This list will be managed by a High Court judge and will apply to all stages of clinical negligence proceedings.

The judge in charge can:

  • set timetables for the exchange of expert reports;
  • make directions for mediation;
  • make orders relating to witness statements or expert evidence; and
  • issue any other directions necessary to ensure fair and prompt resolution of proceedings.

New procedure for applying for a trial date

Practice direction HC131 introduces a new procedure for applying for a trial date in clinical negligence proceedings. The aim of the new procedure is to ensure cases are properly pleaded before a trial date is assigned and to facilitate the earlier resolution of clinical negligence actions. This should in turn decrease legal costs.

Under the new procedure, a party seeking to apply for a trial date must give the other parties 28 days’ notice of their intention to do so and must also complete a Certificate of Compliance for the Court. The requirement to complete such a certificate is a new requirement.

In the Certificate of Compliance, the party applying for a trial date must certify that:

  • they have fully pleaded all aspects of their case;
  • they have exchanged a complete schedule of all witnesses, factual and expert (or have offered to do so);
  • they have exchanged all expert reports intended to be relied upon at trial (or offered to do so); and
  • they undertake to offer mediation within 3 weeks of the date on which the trial date is fixed and to engage in mediation within 6 weeks of the offer being accepted. This requirement to offer mediation in this framework is new and we expect that this will lead to the earlier resolution of claims.

The High Court can refuse an application for a trial date if the applicant fails to comply with these requirements or fails to comply with an order of the Court or agreement between the parties relating to pleadings, discovery or otherwise.

The other party or parties can contest the application for a trial date, in which case the Court will treat the application as a case management hearing.

After a trial date has been fixed, if a party delivers further particulars, expert reports or a schedule of special damages without the consent of the Court, the opposing parties can apply for an adjournment of the trial date. The Court can make such costs order as it considers appropriate where an adjournment is deemed necessary.  

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.