The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486... The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486...

The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486...

The defendant was contracted, during the Covid lockdowns, to source and supply sterile gowns, which the claimant subsequently asserted were not...
Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and... Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

Forensic Science Regulator Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and...

The Forensic Science Regulator has published new Guidance on Forensic Science Activities: Interpretation and Communication. The Guidance applies to...
Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement

We have just completed the regular review of our Standard Expert Terms and Conditions of Engagement. The purpose of the Terms and Conditions is...
New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions

New EWI Guidance on Responding to Written Questions

We have just published our new Guide on Responding to Written Questions. Informed by the knowledge and experience of the EWI Editorial and...
Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report

Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report

The Court excluded consideration of the expert testimony of an expert on the dangers of AI and misinformation, after he submitted an expert...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning children
Sean Mosby 1513

Family Justice Council Guidance on Covert Recordings in Family Law proceedings concerning children

bySean Mosby

 

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published guidance for professionals and litigants who represent themselves on the use of covert recordings in family law proceedings. The guidance follows an increased use of covert recordings in family law proceedings and the need for clear guidance, and the protection and privacy of those subject to the recording.

In summary, the guidance:

  • Outlines considerations undertaken by the court, referencing relevant laws and statutory frameworks involved with covert recordings in legal proceedings – including, the covert recording of children, professionals, and other family members.

  • Explores the consequences and potential issues that may arise from the use of covert recordings in family law proceedings and provides guidance to promote consistency in the approach to these recordings.

  • Emphasises the need for more guidance across professional bodies and organisations regarding the use of covert recordings in legal proceedings in the family justice system. 

  • Analyses key considerations of the courts when assessing covert recordings in legal proceedings, such as the authenticity and completeness of the recording, probative value, and relevance to the case.

The guidance notes that the recording of professionals, either covertly or overtly by request, is a growing phenomenon that does not appear to be reflected in the policies of many professional agencies which serve the family court. The Council notes that, while such recording should not be necessary, there are occasions where these kinds of recordings have been demonstrated to have probative evidential value. It goes on to note, however, that there are circumstances when covert or overt recordings would undermine the validity of expert assessments, for example, in neuropsychological assessments, as it has been demonstrated to influence the quality of interaction and the performance and behaviour of persons under assessment.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.