An expert report that is almost worse than useless An expert report that is almost worse than useless

An expert report that is almost worse than useless

The claimant was involved in a minor road traffic accident while she was the passenger in a car driven by her partner, who was the defendant’s...
When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

When experts are the subject of regulatory complaints

Most professionals who act as expert witnesses are potentially subject to fitness to practice or other types of regulatory or professional body...
The admin behind the expertise The admin behind the expertise

The admin behind the expertise

Highlights from the EWI Technology and Practice Survey 2026 A survey by the Expert Witness Institute, supported by Fortythree Tech
If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules

The expert acting for the appellant had appeared before the Valuation Tribunal for England as advocate and expert for the appellant, and he continued...
Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process

Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process

In this case, the Family Court makes clear the position with regard to people who describe themselves as psychologists but are not (a) regulated by a...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Construction Working with Expert Witnesses in Construction

Working with Expert Witnesses in Construction

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025 Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Podcast Episode 20: Review of 2025

Join us for the last podcast of 2025! With some festive cheer, we review 2025, with the ten key issues for expert witnesses that we've seen over...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him
Sean Mosby 2723

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him

bySean Mosby

 

Summary

The claimant alleged both negligence and breach of contract by the defendant designer of a container park near Felixstowe Port. The judge set out the reasons why she was not impressed by the claimant’s expert and treated his evidence with significant caution.

Learning points

Learning points for experts

  • You should provide sufficient explanation in your report, and under cross-examination, of your analysis for the court to be able to understand your opinion and the basis for it, including:

    • what the analysis is,

    • how it works,

    • whether there were any limitations to its use or the outcome it produced.

  • Do not suggest to the court that Google could provide a better explanation than you could of a term or methodology in your report.

  • Make sure you use the correct, up-to-date (at the time of the events) version of any guidance you rely on.

  • Make sure you understand the correct legal tests and ask yourself, and answer, the correct questions in your report.

  • If you decide to base your report on an earlier draft, make sure it is completely updated to reflect the position of the case and your instructions.

  • Make sure you respond to all of the allegations and don’t try to “simplify” your report by only responding to what you consider to be the key issue.

  • If you consider your report was impacted by time or cost constraints, clearly set out what the constraints were and what impact they had.  

  • If you need to rerun your analysis or change any parameters to address criticism, make sure you inform the parties and the court about what you have done as soon as practical.

Learning points for expert engineers

  • Be wary of using analysis methodologies which would not be used by a competent engineer in a project of the type you are considering.

  • It may be preferable to seek to explain elements of the design and perform hand calculations of the various factors which would influence the design in the same way that an ordinary engineer faced with a design of this sort would in practice.

Learning points for instructing parties

  • Try to ensure that the expert you instruct has sufficient experience dealing with the type of work about which their opinion is being sought.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.