Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149 Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149

Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWCA Civ 149

The Secretary of State for the Home Office was appealing the decision of the First Tier Tribunal (‘FTT’) to allow the Respondent’s...
How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations

How fees and expenses are analysed in the age of remote consultations

Tasib, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] EWHC 139 (Admin) makes for interesting reading because it...
UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of... UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

UPDATE: New Forensic Science Regulator guidance for declaring compliance with the code of...

The guidance sets out the text that you should use in your declarations for work undertaken in England and Wales for the English and Welsh Criminal...
New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body... New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

New EWI guidance on Judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body...

We have just published our new judicial criticism and dealing with regulatory/professional body complaints during a case. Our comprehensive guide is...
Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB) Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

Alexander Valeryevich Timokhin v Anna Anatolyevna Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB)

The dispute was between a former husband and wife, who were Russian nationals, about a post-nuptial agreement. The judge found that much of the expert...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with Expert Witnesses in Serious Injury

Working with expert witnesses... is a new monthly article series. The series takes a look at the role of expert witnesses in a range of sectors from...
Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts

In March's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss some recent examples of experts in the courts, drawing out the key learning points...
Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

Podcast Episode 22: Feedback and Criticism

In February's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at feedback and criticism. We go over the rules, discuss the key recent case...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...
A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Veterinary Expert Witness

Veterinary surgeon, Jeremy Stattersfield, has been guiding courts on veterinary medicine since 1981. He told us how he got into the Expert Witness...
Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

Podcast Episode 21: Responding to Written Questions

In January's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss responding to written questions. We look at the rules and regulations, discuss a...
A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness

Mr Niall Craig is a Consultant Orthopaedic Spinal Surgeon and Expert Witness specialising in complex spinal cases. He tells us about his professional...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him
Sean Mosby 2853

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him

bySean Mosby

 

Summary

The claimant alleged both negligence and breach of contract by the defendant designer of a container park near Felixstowe Port. The judge set out the reasons why she was not impressed by the claimant’s expert and treated his evidence with significant caution.

Learning points

Learning points for experts

  • You should provide sufficient explanation in your report, and under cross-examination, of your analysis for the court to be able to understand your opinion and the basis for it, including:

    • what the analysis is,

    • how it works,

    • whether there were any limitations to its use or the outcome it produced.

  • Do not suggest to the court that Google could provide a better explanation than you could of a term or methodology in your report.

  • Make sure you use the correct, up-to-date (at the time of the events) version of any guidance you rely on.

  • Make sure you understand the correct legal tests and ask yourself, and answer, the correct questions in your report.

  • If you decide to base your report on an earlier draft, make sure it is completely updated to reflect the position of the case and your instructions.

  • Make sure you respond to all of the allegations and don’t try to “simplify” your report by only responding to what you consider to be the key issue.

  • If you consider your report was impacted by time or cost constraints, clearly set out what the constraints were and what impact they had.  

  • If you need to rerun your analysis or change any parameters to address criticism, make sure you inform the parties and the court about what you have done as soon as practical.

Learning points for expert engineers

  • Be wary of using analysis methodologies which would not be used by a competent engineer in a project of the type you are considering.

  • It may be preferable to seek to explain elements of the design and perform hand calculations of the various factors which would influence the design in the same way that an ordinary engineer faced with a design of this sort would in practice.

Learning points for instructing parties

  • Try to ensure that the expert you instruct has sufficient experience dealing with the type of work about which their opinion is being sought.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.