Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC) Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited [2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)

The Claimants alleged that dust, noise and odour emitted by the defendant’s factory over a prolonged period constituted a legal nuisance. The...
Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Lady Simler appointed as President of the Expert Witness Institute

Her appointment was announced at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on Wednesday 15th October.. 
Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

Kathryn Britten awarded Honorary Fellowship of the EWI

The award was made at the Sir Michael Davies Lecture on the 15th of October.
A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Speech and Language Expert Witness

Julie Andrews is a consultant Speech and Language Therapist providing assessments for Special Educational Need (SEND) tribunals and writing...
Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 17: Wellbeing and Resilience as an Expert Witness

October 10th is World Mental Health Day and in this month's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we look at the issue of wellbeing and...
Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025 Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2025

Resolve and EWI held our annual Scottish Medicolegal Conference at the Grand Central Hotel in Glasgow on 19 September. The event featured great...
A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Jewellery and Gemstone Expert Witness

Dr Richard Taylor is an Expert in the identification, verification and valuation of diamonds, gemstones, jewellery, watches, silver and antiques. He...
Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

Podcast Episode 16: CV Writing

In the 16th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and Sean, discuss CV Writing. We look at the purpose of expert CVs, the rules and...
Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness... Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

Podcast Episode 15: The Power of EWI Membership: Raising Standards in Expert Witness...

In the 15th episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkis, discuss the power of EWI membership and the...
A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

A day in the life of an Accommodation Expert Witness

Marisa Shek is a Healthcare Architect and owner of Shek Architects. As an Expert Witness, she specialises in the field of accommodation for disabled...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him
Sean Mosby 2221

Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him

bySean Mosby

 

Summary

The claimant alleged both negligence and breach of contract by the defendant designer of a container park near Felixstowe Port. The judge set out the reasons why she was not impressed by the claimant’s expert and treated his evidence with significant caution.

Learning points

Learning points for experts

  • You should provide sufficient explanation in your report, and under cross-examination, of your analysis for the court to be able to understand your opinion and the basis for it, including:

    • what the analysis is,

    • how it works,

    • whether there were any limitations to its use or the outcome it produced.

  • Do not suggest to the court that Google could provide a better explanation than you could of a term or methodology in your report.

  • Make sure you use the correct, up-to-date (at the time of the events) version of any guidance you rely on.

  • Make sure you understand the correct legal tests and ask yourself, and answer, the correct questions in your report.

  • If you decide to base your report on an earlier draft, make sure it is completely updated to reflect the position of the case and your instructions.

  • Make sure you respond to all of the allegations and don’t try to “simplify” your report by only responding to what you consider to be the key issue.

  • If you consider your report was impacted by time or cost constraints, clearly set out what the constraints were and what impact they had.  

  • If you need to rerun your analysis or change any parameters to address criticism, make sure you inform the parties and the court about what you have done as soon as practical.

Learning points for expert engineers

  • Be wary of using analysis methodologies which would not be used by a competent engineer in a project of the type you are considering.

  • It may be preferable to seek to explain elements of the design and perform hand calculations of the various factors which would influence the design in the same way that an ordinary engineer faced with a design of this sort would in practice.

Learning points for instructing parties

  • Try to ensure that the expert you instruct has sufficient experience dealing with the type of work about which their opinion is being sought.

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.