10 March 2023 Wiebke Morgan 2058 News Expert evidence a matter for Trial judge: Application to exclude it at pre-trial stage refused as misconceived byWiebke Morgan In a fatal accident and personal injury damages claim the claimant made a number of criticisms of the Defendant’s expert’s report and applied to exclude it on several grounds: lack of expertise expressing opinions outside areas of expertise failure to maintain impartiality Mr Dexter Dias KC (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) found the application to be fundamentally misconceived and dismissed it. He gave each ground in-depth consideration and found that it was a matter for the trial judge to determine – not at pre-trial. The judgement (link below) is worth reading. For example, regarding the allegation of ‘expressing opinions outside their expertise’, the judge states: “I find that this particular objection is classically a matter for the trial judge's judgment and discretion. I conclude, first, that it is not a basis for the exclusion of Mr X's evidence; second, it is not appropriate at this point, as Mr Y submits as his subsidiary position, to excise or to remove a particular passage or passages. That is a matter for the trial judge to assess once the evidence is before her or him.” More links Link to judgement Share Print Tags 05. Rules and Regulations Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB) Switch article Too much of a good thing Previous Article Pain Expert Limited approved as an EWI Corporate Partner Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.