21 February 2022 Priya Vaidya 2452 Case Updates Director of Public Prosecutions v IG [2021] IECA 91 by Priya Vaidya The case: The appellant was convicted of rape, sexual assault and making a threat to kill or cause serious harm to the complainant The appellant in the four of five interviews denied sexual intercourse but when the results of certain DNA tests showing the presence of his semen in or on the body of the complainant were put to him in the fifth, he said that intercourse had taken place by consent. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Expert Report or MG11 form? Lorimer-Wing v Hashmi [2026] EWHC 1843 (Ch) Dermot Speight & Ors (as trustees of the Thornaby Angling Association) v Robert James Pickersgill [2026] EWCC 48 Be cautious when accepting instructions from a Litigant in Person A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness Switch article Fixed recoverable costs in lower value clinical negligence claims Previous Article ECU Group PLC v HSBC Bank PLC [2021] EWHC 2875 (Comm) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.