Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness

The parties disagreed on the extent of the repairs required to the joists, and the manner in which the repairs should be effected, following the...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

Disclosure and redaction of medical and safeguarding records

We have previously considered the problem for experts of redacted medical records. This, and the actual disclosure of medical, and also safeguarding,...
Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Help us map those working in the UK as Expert Witnesses

Have your say in this important research and be in with a chance of winning £200 in vouchers of your choice.
Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch) Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

Gary Alexander MacDougall v Lloyd Philip Thomas & Ors [2026] EWHC 1142 (Ch)

The case focussed on the validity of a will and codicil made by a wealthy lady, Mrs MacDougall, as well as a number of substantial gifts and...
Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings

Unregulated Experts in Family Court Children Proceedings

From March to June 2025, the Family Procedure Rule Committee held a consultation on new Family Procedure Rule 25.5A concerning the instruction of...
Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and... Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and...

Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and...

In the fourth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Michael Kingman from Setfords Solicitors, discusses his experience of...
Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 25: Preview of the EWI Annual Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we preview the EWI  Annual Conference which will be held virtually on 19 June 2026. We look at some of...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...
Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

Podcast Episode 24: Marketing your expert witness practice

In April's episode of the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a deep dive into Marketing your Expert Witness Practice, providing practical advice on...
A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness

We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service...
A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Clinical Psychologist Expert Witness

Dr Jane Duff is a Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of the National Spinal Injuries Centre Psychology Service, and an Expert Witness. Here, she...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Criminal Procedure Rules: new criminal practice directions
Wiebke Morgan 6323

Criminal Procedure Rules: new criminal practice directions

byWiebke Morgan

On 29 May 2023 new criminal practice directions came into force. They are now organised as a set of chapters. Chapter 7 deals with Expert Evidence. There are several changes to note. 

Prof Keith Rix, Certified Fellow of the EWI  highlights and comments on these:

"First, 7.1.1 (previously 19A.1) has had a new item added to it:

 

7.1.1     Expert opinion evidence is admissible in criminal proceedings if, in summary:
                …
(d)          the expert opinion is sufficiently reliable to be admitted.

So there should be a ‘methodology’ section in your report where you provide sufficient information about the methodology you have adopted for the court to assess the reliability of your opinion 

Second, in relation to the requirement that a party wishing to introduce expert evidence should give notice of anything of which that party is aware which might reasonably be thought capable of undermining the reliability of the expert’s opinion or detracting from their credibility or impartiality, one of the examples has been made more explicit. 19A.7 (c) which is now 7.1.4(c) has been expanded from ‘adverse judicial comment’ to:

 

                adverse judicial comment regarding a particular expert or corporation or other body for whom the expert works whether by a first instance tribunal or on appeal

 

Third, whereas previously the parties were asked to consider holding an experts’ meeting, and they were not compulsory unless ordered by the court, paragraph 7.3.1 (previously 19C.1) states:

                The court must give a direction for a pre-hearing discussion between experts in every case unless unnecessary.

 

This means that experts’ meetings in the criminal jurisdiction are likely to become as common as in the civil and family jurisdictions.

 

Fourth, there is a change to the ‘Expert’s Declaration’ that affects experts instructed by the prosecution. The extra declaration required of experts instructed by the prosecution should now refer to the current CPS Guidance for Experts on Disclosure, Unused Material, and Case Management " 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.